Tag: Penalty 271C
No Penalty leviable u/s 271C on mere delay in remittance/deposit of the TDS after deduction subject to provisions of Section 201(1A) and Section 276B – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3703 (2023) (04) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Lakshadweep Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner …
Show Cause Notice, Order and Penalty passed during lockdown period quashed as assessee had no opportunity to explain the case. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3307 (2020) (05) HC In this case, a Petition was been filed by the assessee praying for quashing the order passed by the Income …
Tax deduction by bank before close of financial year would not absolve penalty u/s 271C for non deduction of TDS if there was no reasonable cause to permit exemption u/s 273 B – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2642 (2018) (11) HC The appellant bank had …
Limitation us 275 imposing penalty starts from the date of initiation by the Assessing Officer though it is imposable by Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income-tax but there is no bar on the initiation of penalty proceedings by the ITO. Proceedings us 272A(2)(k), 271C held time barred by ITAT ABCAUS …
Penalty us 271C-Contumacious conduct of assessee necessary to be established before penalty for failure to deduct tax at source (TDS) can be imposed-Supreme Court Case Details: Civil Appeal No. 1704 of 2008 Commr. of Income Tax Delhi (Appellant) vs. Bank of Nova Scotia (Respondent) Date of Judgment: 07/01/2016 Coram: …
