Day: January 26, 2019
Penalty u/s 271D unjustified when bank refused loan and cash was obtained for meeting urgent business expenses as it was a reasonable cause u/s 273B ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2750 (2019) (01) ITAT The instant appeal by the assessee was against the order passed by the Commissioner …
Penalty u/s 271D was absurd when assessee himself was karta of HUF from where he obtained cash loan-ITAT deleted penalty for violation of section 269SS ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2749 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Rajendra Suryavanshi Vs ACIT (2011) 141 …
Taxability of interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894. ITAT quashed CIT order believing that division bench order of the Supreme Court was not good law ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2748 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Ghanshyam, HUF reported at 315 …
