Category: Income Tax
Without rejecting books of account, it was not proper to make addition towards unexplained investment u/s 69 of the Act  ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2982 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Smt. P.K. Noorjahan’s (237 ITR 570) w The instant appeal …
Purchasing many small properties itself not good enough reason to hold that it was a business transaction. The quantum or number or number of investments i.e. whether the assessee invested in a single property or in many small properties to get better appreciation, does not change the nature …
Sericulture income from sale of cocoons taxed @ 50% being not agricultural income following judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2980 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: L. Basavaraj Vs. ACIT (2015) 61 taxmann.com 67 (Karn) Lakshmanan & …
Disallowance u/s 37(1) for pan masala seized deleted following SC decision that Explanation 1 apply to business expenses not to business losses ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2979 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: T.A. Quereshi Vs. CIT (2006) 286 ITR 547 The …
Addition for cash deposit deleted as cash withdrawals, redeposit took place during the year itself, there was no question of making addition ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2978 (2019) (05) ITAT The appeal by the assessee was directed against the order passed by the CIT(A) against the confirmation …
Notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO of non jurisdictional ward and consequent assessment framed was invalid and hence both quashed ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2977 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Hindustan Transport Co. vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner 189 ITR 326 Abhishek …
Penalty u/s 271AAB-Cash advances recorded in diary held not undisclosed Income when assessee was not carrying on any business and declared the surrendered income in return ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2974 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: DCIT, Coimbatore Vs. R. Elanyovan …
Deduction u/s 80P(2) not allowed for unexplained income assessed u/s 68 of the Act. The addition u/s 68 did not increases income allowable for deduction u/s 80P ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2973 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: A. Govindarajalu Mudaliar vs. …
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) deleted when assessment was framed u/s 143(3) proving that the assessee had cooperated in the assessment proceedings ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2972 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Pramila Kumari Vs DCIT (2011) 49 CCH 0401 In the instant …
Deduction u/s 54F for house purchased from father in law allowed when he was assessed to long term capital gain with reference to sold house ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2971 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: In this appeal, the assessee had …
