Category: High Courts
High Court refuses to quash prosecution proceedings u/s 276C, directs prayer for bail be considered and decided if applicant surrenders before Trial court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3170 (2019) (10) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. 2004 (57) ALR …
Opposition of trade mark registration before Registrar is a quasi judicial proceedings and can not be termed as groundless threats u/s 142 of the Trademarks Act. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3168 (2019) (10) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Sidharth Wheels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bedrock Ltd. …
Addition u/s 68 upheld as cash was deposited in bank by the loan creditor immediately before transfer and was poor being not an income tax assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3148 (2019) (09) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Commissioner of Income Tax versus Deen Dayal …
Law as on 1st day of assessment year not applicable to financial year in respect of amendments coming into force after first day of April of financial year. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3147 (2019) (09) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Badri Prasad & ors. vs. …
Evidentiary value of a statement made on oath by the assessee to the income tax authority in survey proceedings u/s 133A of the Income Tax Act-High Court explains ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3144 (2019) (09) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Paul Mathews and Sons v. …
Interest awarded in motor accident claim cases from the date of the Claim Petition till passing of award/judgment not taxable, being not an income. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3142 (2019) (09) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Rama Bai and ors. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, …
Company filing complaints/petitions against various CAs in organised manner fined with Rs. One lakhs to discourage making litigation a business. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3135 (2019) (09) HC In the instant case, the petitioner was a private limited company. The petitioner had filed the petition, inter alia, impugning …
There is no requirement to obtain NOC from previous auditor. Dissuading other CAs from taking up audit not object of CA Act 1949- HC ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3134 (2019) (09) HC The petitioner, a chartered accountants firm had filed a petition impugning the order passed by the …
Reopening done at the insistence of CIT held as change of opinion and was vitiated in law as it did not satisfy the legal requirement of Section 147 of the Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3124 (2019) (08) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Larsen and …
Revision u/s 263 merely on ground of non-discussion / non-mentioning of reply to queries in assessment proceeding/order is invalid ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3123 (2019) (08) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Malabar Industrial Company vs. CIT (2000) 109 taxman 66 (SC)CIT vs. Krishan Capbox Ltd. …