Category: High Courts
In a latest judgment, Delhi High Court has quashed CBDT order rejecting refund of TDS deducted on penal interest treating it non-exempt u/s 10(15)(iv)(c) considering it as a result of violation/transgression of the loan agreement. The Court observed that the penal interest was imposed as part of the conditions of the …
In a recent judgment, Allahabad High Court has held that right of appeal is a matter of procedure which gets converted into a substantive right as a creature of statute which cannot create a retrospective right. The appeal has to be filed within the limitation prescribed. Case Details: ITA …
The Union Budget 2016-17 has proposed withdrawal of the service tax exemption to senior advocates in relation to services provided to other advocates or partnership law firms. Accordingly Service Tax Notification 18/2016 and Notification No. 09/2016 had been issued. The said withdrawal of exemption to senior advocates was challenged in …
In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court has held that Indian National Congress Party (INC) (I) not entitled to exemption u/s 13A of the Income tax Act, 1961 for AY 1994-95 being failed to fulfil the three conditions of keeping books of accounts, maintaining records of voluntary contributions …
Calcutta High Court in a recent judgment has held that expenditure incurred for software development was capital expenditure Case Details: ITA No. 278 OF 2007 Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd Versus Commissioner of Income Tax-III Kolkata Date of Judgment: 18/03/2016 Question of Law: Whether on the facts and in the …
In a recent judgment, Calcutta High Court has held that to claim exemption under section 10(22A), existence of a nexus between the hospital or an institution engaged in any one of the five activities, and the income is essential. Kindly note that the said section 10(22A) has since been …
While reversing order of CIT(A), Tribunal duty bound to examine and discuss reasons given While reversing the order of the CIT(A) the Tribunal is duty bound to examine and discuss the reasons given by the CIT(A) to hold one way or the other and then to dispel those …
Deduction 33AB first allowed from composite income before apportionment under Rule 8(1) between agricultural non-agricultural The deduction u/s 33AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 shall be allowed from the total composite income derived from growing and manufacturing tea and only after such deduction is made, Rule 8(1) shall be …
TDS default proceedings u/s 201(3) for a period earlier than 4 years prior to 31-03-2011 not authorized by CBDT Circular-05/2010 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(C) 8535/2011 & CM APPLS 19305/2011, 9781/2012 W.P.(C) 8536/2011 & CM APPLS 19307/2011, 9778/2012 W.P.(C) 8537/2011 & CM APPLS 19309/2011, 9776/2012 VODAFONE ESSAR …
Assessee entitled to interest u/s 244A(1)(b) for excess payment on self assessment tax-Kolkata HC HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ITA No.526 OF 2004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA – I Versus BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITED Coram: Hon’ble Justice Girish Chandra Gupta And Hon’ble Justice Asha Arora Judgment Date: 02-02-2016 GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA …
