Category: Income Tax
Loan pre-payment premium/charges paid for reducing interest liability not result in acquisition of any asset and not a capital but Revenue expenditure ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2890 (2019) (04) HC The instant appeal was filed by the Revenue against the impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate …
Front end fees paid to bank for obtaining new loan is revenue expenditure by nature and the assessee is entitled to amortize it – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2889 (2019) (04) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Madras Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd. …
CBDT issues clarification on linking of PAN with Aadhaar Government of IndiaMinistry of FinanceDepartment of RevenueCentral Board of Direct Taxes New Delhi, 31st March, 2019 PRESS RELEASE CBDT issues clarification on linking of PAN with Aadhaar It has been reported in some sections of the media that those …
In the absence of finding as to the year of purchase, jewellery found in locker would not represent the undisclosed income as defined in the explanation to section 271AAB of the Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2887 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by …
Rectification order u/s 154 quashed due to doctrine of merger. Questions expressly decided by appellate/revisional authority cannot be reagitated u/s 154 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2886 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Rajputana Mining Agencies & others vs ITO (1979) 118 ITR …
Prosecution u/s 276C- Signing, verification of ITR by director is prima-facie evidence. Charge to be framed even on the basis of strong suspicion ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2885 (2019) (04) TC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Union of India vs Prafulla Kumar Samal and …
Difference in Tribunal and non jurisdictional High Court amounts to two opposite views despite that decision of High Court rendered after ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2884 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Gouli Mahadevappa vs. ITO 356 ITR 90 (Karn) Prakash …
Addition made by AO in limited scrutiny by extending scope deleted as AO did not take due permission to convert it into full scrutiny. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2883 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the partiesCIT Vs. Mekala Balreddy The appeal in the instant …
CBDT invites comments on report on Profit Attribution to PE in India. The Committee had examined the existing scheme under Article 7 of DTAAs, and recommended changes in Rule 10 Government of IndiaMinistry of FinanceDepartment of RevenueCentral Board of Direct Taxes New Delhi, 18th April, 2019 PRESS RELEASE …
Income Tax Act does not invite any pre-deposit for stay of demand. 20 per cent amount prescribed by CBDT Instruction can be reduced at the discretion of AO-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2882 (2019) (04) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties The …
