Category: Judgments
Neither assessee can withdraw appeal nor CIT(A) can dismiss appeal for non-prosecution. ITAT explains the powers and duty of the First Appellate Authority. Dismisses of appeal by CIT(A) for non-prosecution results as withdrawal of appeal which is not permitted. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3084 (2019) (07) ITAT Important …
Property acquired by ITD u/s 269UE-High Court asks CBDT to consider regularising ownership of bonafide purchaser on payment of difference in FMV ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3083 (2019) (07) HC The instant Writ Petition was filed by a Cooperative Housing Society claiming to be the owners of land …
Assessment order in the name of non-existent amalgamating company void. Supreme Court put the controversy to rest once for all ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3082 (2019) (07) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Spice Entertainment Ltd. v Commissioner of Service Tax 2012 (280) ELT 43 (Del.)Skylight …
Notice u/s 263 issued by AO was held valid when notice itself stated that PCIT directed its issuance and AO signed it merely in his ministerial capacity ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3081 (2019) (07) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:CIT Vs. Amitabh Bachchan, (2016) 384 …
Mere Permission to do work from home not take away status as employees for the purpose of EPF Act – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3080 (2019) (07) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:M/s P. M. Patel & Sons and Ors. v. Union of …
Salary accrued to non-resident for services rendered outside India not taxable and included in the total income. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3079 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Utanka Roy vs. DCIT & Others reported in 390 ITR 109 (Cal) The instant appeal by …
Good Work Reward to employee held not constituting bonus u/s 36(1)(ii) and allowable as normal business expenditure u/s 37 of the Act. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3078 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Shriram Pistons & Rings Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, (2008) …
Claim for exemption u/s 54B allowed though not made in the return of income. AO had disallowed claim as revised return was not filed ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3077 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:M/s. Goetze India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT 284 ITR …
No disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for short deduction of TDS made at less than prescribed rates. ITAT deleted addition following various judgments of High Courts. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3076 (2019) (07) ITAT DCIT vs. Chandabhoy reported in (2012) 17 taxmann. Com 158 (Mum.)CIT-LTU vs. HewlettPackard India Sales (P.) …
Merely making cash payments cannot be a ground for disallowance if section 40A(3) not violated or no defects were found in books of accounts/bills & vouchers ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3075 (2019) (07) ITAT The assessee had challenged the order of CIT(A) in sustaining the part disallowance out …