Tag: addition 69C
When AO invoked provisions of section 37(1) to disallow purchases, provisions of section 69C of the Act are not applicable In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has held that when AO did not raise any doubts about the source of such purchases but invoked the provisions of section …
When assessee failed to explain source of purchases expenditure, estimating profit rate was contrary to provision of Section 69C which calls for addition of the entire amount. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed SLP against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which held that when …
Documentary evidences filed on the day on which assessment order was passed are not additional evidence requiring compliance Rule 46A – ITAT In A recent judgment, ITAT Agra held that documentary evidences filed electronically on the day on which assessment order was passed are not additional evidence requiring …
Addition u/s 69C towards alleged bogus purchase deleted due to failure of AO to bring on record any material/evidence for alleging such transactions. In a recent judgment, Kolkata ITAT has deleted addition made u/s 69C towards alleged bogus purchase due to failure of the AO to bring on …
ITAT confirmed addition u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure over and above Gross Profit addition In a recent judgment, ITAT Hyderabad confirmed addition under section 69C as unexplained expenditure over and above the GP addition holding that the two additions serve different purposes i.e. one addresses the unexplained nature …
Addition for unexplained expenditure incurred on election on candidates of Aam Aadmi Party confirmed by ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has upheld the addition for unexplained expenditure incurred on election on candidates of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 4128 (2024) (07) ITAT In …
Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission – Allahabad HC directs AO decide the issue In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has directed AO to examine non applicability of Section 115BBE read …
ITAT partly confirms addition of site expenses as unexplained expenditure for being not accounted for in the books of accounts in the expense ledger In a recent judgment, the ITAT has confirmed the addition of unexplained expenditure u/s 69C towards site expenses not accounted for in the books …
Addition for unexplained agricultural expenditure u/s 69C deleted. Agricultural expenses depend on so many factors which were ignored by Assessing Officer (AO) – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT has deleted the addition made u/s 69C towards unexplained agricultural expenditure holding that expenses on agriculture depend on many …
Mere affidavits of typographical error by typist & CA in Audit Report not enough when assessee was found to maintain duplicate accounts – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3735 (2023) (05) SC Important Case Laws relied upon:CST vs. Esufali (HM) Abdulali (HM) (1973) 90 ITR 271 (SC)Nalinakshi …
