Tag: concealment penalty
Mere agreeing to increased net profit rate, by itself was no ground to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) when it was already higher compared to preceding assessment years – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2840 (2019) (03) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Harigopal Singh …
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted for claiming depreciation on assets for which invoices were raised by the vendor in the name of the other firm – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2796 (2019) (02) ITAT The appeal in the instant case was filed by assessee against the appellate …
Not disclosing salary was not concealment when TDS also not claimed by the assessee. ITAT deleted penalty holding that there was a reasonable cause provided in Section 273B ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2761 (2019) (01) ITAT This assessee had challenged the order of the Commissioner of Income …
When assessee during assessment proceedings voluntarily admitted mistake then mere absence of revised return would not justify penalty u/s 271(1)(c) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2738 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT Vs. Man Industries Ltd.(2018) 164 DTR (Bom) 165 CIT Vs. Somany Evergreen Knits …
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed by CIT without recording satisfaction in revision order 263. Provision of Section 271(1B) not applicable as CIT is not AO u/s 2(7) of Income Tax Act, 1961. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2732 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: …
Validity of Penalty notice non striking off relevant limb u/s 271(1)(c) upheld when subsequent opportunity notices sent by AO were not challenged ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2731 (2019) (01) ITAT The assessee had filed the instant appeal against the order passed by the CIT(A) upholding the penalty …
When assessee surrendered exemption claimed on the condition that penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) are not initiated there was no question of concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2698 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT vs. Manjunatha …
Mere making a claim for set off of losses not furnishing inaccurate particulars of income as it was personal opinion with regard to income-tax – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2646 (2018) (11) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT Vs. Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. (2010) 322 …
Not disclosing accrued FDR interest payable on maturity was not Concealment. Penalty deleted as interest was payable on termination or on maturity ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2645 (2018) (11) ITAT The instant appeal of the assessee was directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) …
No concealment penalty can be levied for only change of head of income – ITAT deleted penalty for change head from capital gains to business income ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2604 (2018) (11) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: M/s Crown Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The ACIT …