Tag: concealment penalty
No concealment penalty on return revision made before issue of notice u/s 148 though after initiation of investigation in tax evasion petition filed against the assessee – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1215 (2017) (04) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee company was aggrieved by the order …
Concealment means positive act on part of the assessee and the onus to prove is on Revenue. Penalty can not be levied on estimate or guess work – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1214 (2017) (04) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee company was aggrieved by the …
Penalty notice without specific charges when assessee had no confusion as to if it was for concealment or inaccurate particulars as appeared from his reply. Penalty Upheld by ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1207 (2017) (04) ITAT The Grievance: The assessee was aggrieved by order passed by the …
Reduction of loan waived from fixed assets actual cost-wdv u/s 43(6)(c) not required for calculating depreciation allowable under Income tax Act – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1190 (2017) (03) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee company was aggrieved by the order passed by the CIT(A) confirming …
Concealment penalty deleted when income was received by cheque after deducting TDS. ITAT accepts that non disclosure was inadvertent not willful. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1171 (2017) (03) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee had challenged the order of CIT(A) confirming the order of Assessing Officer …
No concealment penalty without recording findings to bonafide of the explanation offered by the assessee with reasoning. ITAT deletes penalty u/s 271(1)(c) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1140 (2017) (02) ITAT The Grievance: The assessee is aggrieved with the levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, …
Non striking off clause in penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) do not invalidate it. ITAT deviates from the Judgment of Karnataka High Court follows jurisdictional High Court In a recent judgment, ITAT Mumbai has upheld the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) dismissing the contention of the assessee regarding not striking off …
Penalty initiated for concealment levied for inaccurate particulars and concealment both is invalid. AO must frame a precise charge u/s 271(1)(c)-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1073 (2016) (12) ITAT Assessment Year: 2009-10 Date of Judgment: 29-11-2016 Important Case Laws cited: Zoom Communications P Ltd 327 ITR 510 …
No income concealment us 271(1(c) on gift under explanation 5A. NSC declared us 153A was received as inheriting, gift from father, grandfather-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1032 (2016) (10) ITAT Important case law cited: Sheraton Apparels Vs. ACIT (2002) 256 ITR 20 Brief Facts of the Case: The …
Penalty 271(1)(c) interest on income-tax refund not added to income but disclosed in notes to accounts as contingent income HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ITA 291 of 2009 CIT-II Ves. PILANI INVESTMENT & INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD. Coram: Hon’ble Justice Girish Chandra Gupta And Hon’ble Justice Asha Arora Date on which Judgment …
