Tag: deduction u/s 54F

Two distinct, non-adjacent flats at opposite ends of two different floors does not fulfill the criteria for exemption under Section 54F  – Delhi High Court In a recent judgment, Delhi High Court held that use of the word ‘a‘ in Section 54F of the Income Tax Act denotes …

When assessee himself declared income as business or profession AO could not be directed to consider claim u/s 54/54F of the Act  In a recent judgment, ITAT Chennai held that when assessee himself declared income under the head “business or profession” and no capital gain was declared, no …

No bar under law to claim deduction u/s 54 and u/s 54F simultaneously in respect of the same asset – ITAT  In a recent judgment, ITAT Pune has held that there is no bar under law to claim deduction u/s 54 and u/s 54F simultaneously in respect of …

Exemption u/s 54F can not be denied merely making wife & son as co-owners of property  In a recent judgment, Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana has held that merely mentioning the names of his wife and son as joint-owners of the property, would not dis-entitle assessee …

Deduction u/s 54F allowed for residential house purchased in the name of wife – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Chennai has allowed Deduction u/s 54F for residential house purchased in the name of wife holding that assessee and his wife would have commonality of interest to …

Size of the residential house is not a criteria for claiming exemption u/s 54F – ITAT  In a recent judgment, the ITAT Delhi has held that size of the residential house is not a criteria for claiming exemption u/s 54F ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 4065 (2024) (06) ITAT …

Deduction u/s 54F despite assessee owning more than two house properties made order erroneous and prejudicial – ITAT In a recent judgment, the Mumbai ITAT has upheld the revisionary order u/s 263 where Assessing Officer (AO) allowed deduction u/s 54F despite assessee owning more than two house properties. …

Capital gain exemption u/s 54F denied as new house was in the name of husband In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that capital gain exemption u/s 54F was not allowable as the new house was in the sole name of husband and was purchased out of bank …

Compensation received for vacating flat possession not taxable it is neither chargeable under the head ‘capital gains’ nor as income from other sources – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that compensation received by the assessee for vacating flat possession was not taxable as it was …

Deduction u/s 54F allowable despite postdated cheque not cleared or details thereof not mentioned in agreement – ITAT In a latest judgment, ITAT has allowed Capital Gain Exemption / deduction u/s 54F despite postdated cheque not cleared within the due date for filing of return or details of …