Tag: income tax penalty prosecution
Penalty notice u/s 271AAB without specifying at what percentage the penalty will be levied makes it defective and invalid and deserved to be quashed-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3274 (2020) (02) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:DCIT v/s R. ElangovanRavi Mathur vs. DCITPr. CIT vs. …
No Penalty u/s 271B where assessee under bona-fide belief failed to get accounts audited u/s 44AB despite turnover exceeding threshold for sale/purchase of shares ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3216 (2020) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal had been filed at the instance of the Assessee against …
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) deleted when assessment was framed u/s 143(3) proving that the assessee had cooperated in the assessment proceedings ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2972 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Pramila Kumari Vs DCIT (2011) 49 CCH 0401 In the instant …
Penalty u/s 271B deleted for frequent change of Managing Director resulting delay in statutory audit causing delay in audit u/s 44AB within stipulated period. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2967 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. vs. …
Penalties shall followed by prosecutions-CBDT Chairman. Action shall be taken even before filing return for huge cash deposits with unmatched past profile of the assessees. CBDT Chairman Shri Sushil Chandra in his latest TV interview has hinted the impending actions that are being planned by the CBDT after 30th …
