Tag: ITAT Chandigrah

Indirect expenses can never be in proportion to sale. There was no reason to ask justification to explain variation in expenses for the fluctuation in sales and make addition of projected expenses on the basis of increase in sale.  This was held by ITAT, Chandigarh while quashing additions …

Capital Gain Exemption u/s 54B investment in wife name allowed but disallowed in bhabhi name ABCAUS Citation:910 (2016) (03) 2016 Date/Month of Order: March, 2016 ORDER This is an appeal filed by Revenue against the order of learned CIT(A), Ludhiana, dated 17.10.2014, for the Asst. Year 2009-10. 2. The …

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) for cash payments cannot be made if genuineness not doubted – ITAT INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR I.T.A No. 102(Asr)/2014 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Rakesh Kumar (Appellant) vs. Asst. CIT (Respondent) Date of Order: 09-03-2016 ORDER PER T. S. KAPOOR (AM): This is an appeal filed by …

Penalty-2711c not imposable if income estimated u/s 144 where books of accounts not produced INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR ITA No.293(Asr)/2013 Assessment year: 2005-06 Income Tax Officer (Appellant)  vs. M/s. Age Construction Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent) Date of Order: 04-03/2016 ORDER PER A.D. JAIN, JM: This is the Department’s …

Penalty 271(1)(c) – Limitation provisions u/s 275(1A) apply as per law in force at the time of filing of return INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR I.T.A No.137(Asr)/2014 Assessment Year: 1994-95 Income Tax Officer (Appellant) vs. K.D. Bali (Respondent) Date of Order: 04-03-2016 ORDER PER T. S. KAPOOR (AM): This …

Order passed by CIT-Appeals without waiting for Remand Report called from AO quashed INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR I.T.A No. 442(Asr)/2013 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Iqbal Singh (Appellant) vs. Income Tax Officer (Respondent) Date of Order: 04-03-2016 ORDER PER T. S. KAPOOR (AM): This is an appeal filed by the …