Tag: Notice u/s 133(6)

Addition u/s 68 for differences in outstanding balances not confirmed by parties without doubting transactions

Addition u/s 68 for differences in outstanding balances not confirmed by parties cannot be made without doubting identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2529 (2018) 09 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Aurobindo Sanitary Stores vs. CIT 2005-(IT3)-GJX-0127-ORI. DCIT vs. …

Reopening for cash deposits for non response to notice u/s 133(6) illegal where assessment was completed u/s 143(3)/147 4 years before

Reopening for cash deposits for non response to notice u/s 133(6) is illegal where assessment was completed u/s 143(3)/147 and 4 years have lapsed. Soon after the demonetization, the Income Tax Department (‘Department’) had launched a scheme called “operation Clean money” for online verification of cash deposits in …