Tag: objections to reopening
Reassessment held bad in law as assessee not given four weeks time to seek legal remedy after rejection of objections to reopening ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3438 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Smt. Kamlesh Goel vs. Income Tax OfficerPr. CIT vs. Sagar DeveloperBharat …
Directions u/s 144A does not affect applicability of decision of the Supreme Court in GKN Driveshaft for disposing off objections to reopening ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3173 (2019) (10) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:M/s. Deepak Extrusions Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income …
Reassessment order passed without disposing objections bad in law. Dismissal of SLP by Supreme Court without assigning reasons not a declaration of law ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2922 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties National Thermal Power Co., Ltd., Vs. CIT …
CIT(A) direction to initiate fresh reassessment proceeding after deciding assessee’s objections set aside as reassessment was bad in law ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2692 (2019) (01) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Multiplex Trading & Industrial Co. Ltd. 170 (Delhi). G.K.N Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO: (2003) …
Re-assessment order passed in violation of guidelines laid down by the Supreme court in the case of GKN Driveshaft Ltd. is bad in law- ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2676 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:GKN Driveshaft (India) Ltd. Vs ITO, 259 ITR 19 PCIT vs …
AO directed to decide objections before making re-assessment as per law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Limited ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2621 (2018) (11) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: GKN Driveshafts (India) Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer (2003) 259 …
Income Tax Notice served on security guard at factory held validly and properly served under the provisions of Section 282(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961-High Court Supreme Court has dismissed the SLP Filed by the assessee against the judgment of the High Court (ABCAUS 2388 (2018) (10) SC) Read …
Return filed with wrong jurisdiction cannot be considered for deciding the validity of reopening u/s 148 as AO’s belief is based on material available with him – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 2368 (2018) 06 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee challenging the order …
Initiation of reopening u/s 148 by recording wrong facts not categorically rebutted by the Department held to be arbitrary and bad in law – ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the appellant assessee against the order of the CIT(A) upholding the reassessment proceedings and re-assessment order passed …
Non disposal of reopening objection not make order void or non est. It is only procedure irregularity curable by remitting. High Court explains law on non-disposal of objections. The question involved in the presnt case was whether the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (ITO/AO) u/s 143(3) …
