Tag: penalty 271(1)(c)

Concealment penalty deleted as assessee was unaware of tax on sale of property. Assessee agreed to pay taxes on the capital gain and paid the tax same date the assessment order was passed ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2172 (2018) (01) ITAT The Challenge/Grievance: The main grievance of …

Addition made in computation of income comes under Explanation 1(B) of Section 271(1) related to concealment penalty under the Income Tax Act. Explanation rejected by ITAT in assessment proceedings, can not be considered bona fide in penalty proceedings-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2169 (2018) (01) HC …

Specifying limb of penalty section 271(1)(c) arises only when addition is made by the AO and not where assessee surrenders the income – ITAT Prelude: Issuance of show cause notice u/s 274 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for imposing penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act …

Voluntary disclosure in all cases cannot absolve liability of concealment penalty. High Court confirmed penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for deferral/avoidance of tax. Willful concealment is not an essential ingredient for attracting civil liability as is the case in the matter of prosecution under section 276C – High Court ABCAUS Case …

Penalty can not be imposed on the basis of findings of assessment proceedings as they cannot automatically be adopted in penalty proceedings. Denial made in assessment proceedings on the basis of human probability can not be the basis for the purpose of levying penalty under Section 271(1)(c) – …

Penalty 271(1)(c) for mistakenly interchanged opening wdv of fixed assets with block of assets admissible a higher rate of depreciation   ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2089 (2017) (10) ITAT The Challenge/Grievance: The appellant assesseeschallenged the order passed by the CIT(A) confirming action of Assessing Officer  (AO) in …

20 years aged person capable enough to give tips for purchasing shares. ITAT deletes penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for subjective disallowance of commission paid for tips given to customers- ITAT   ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2030 (2017) (08) ITAT Assessment Year :  2010-11 Brief Facts of the Case: …

No concealment penalty for wrong claim on the advice of CA. Even if it was wrong, it could be a good case for addition but not for penalty – Punjab & Haryana High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1296 (2017) (07) HC The Question framed for determination: …

Penalty us 271(1)(c) invoking discretionary jurisdiction us 40A(2)(b) invalid. Income assessed on the basis of deeming provisions would not amount to non-disclosure-Allahabad High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1287 (2017) (07) HC The Issue: The only point of the litigation was regarding the levy of penalty under Section …

Penalty us 271(1)(c) for black money in Swiss bank deleted on legal grounds by the ITAT as the Income Tax Department failed poorly to prosecute on legal grounds. This is in fact one of the example to what extent Income Tax Department had prepared its officer with required …