Tag: section 54f
No bar in claiming deduction u/s 54F in reopening proceedings u/s 147. ITAT direct Assessing Officer to decide exemption afresh ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3324 (2020) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal of the assessee was directed against the ex parte order passed by the …
Exemption u/s 54F allowed as vendor insisted for execution of two sale deeds to avoid TDS as agreement for purchase of property was not disputed ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3319 (2020) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal was filed by the assessee against the order passed …
Benefit of exemption u/s 54F before its amendment can be extended to a residential house purchased outside India. ITAT allowed claim ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3195 (2019) (12) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Anurag Pandit The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the …
Exemption u/s 54F for plot in the name of HUF allowed by ITAT following High Court judgment as members of HUF were not stranger and money was contributed by assessee. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2817 (2019) (03) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT …
Booking of flat is not date of acquisition for claim of capital gain exemption u/s 54F. ITAT upheld denial of exemption as asset was not held for more than 3 years ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2490 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: …
No Section 54F exemption if construction not started within time prescribed. Development charges paid not start of construction-Allahabad HC In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has held that capital gain exemption u/s 54F not allowable if construction not started within prescribed time. ABCAUS Case Law …
Deemed consideration us 50C eligible for 54F exemption for capital gain purpose. Net consideration include Fair market value under deeming fiction. This was held by ITAT hyderabad in a recent judgment as under: Case Law Details: ITA.No.848/Hyd/2015 Assessment Year 2010-2011 Income Tax Officer (Appellant) vs. Kondal Reddy Mandal Reddy …
ITAT Mumbai, in a recent case has stated that demolition/destruction of house not necessarily results in transfer u/s 2(47) by extinguishment of rights in a capital assets for capital gain purpose. Case Law Details: I.T.A. No. 6169/Mum/2013 Assessment Year : 2007-08 Dilip Manhar Parekh vs. Dy. Commissioner of …
