Tag: section 68 satisfaction
Non-filing of ITRs by lenders can give rise to suspicion for the lack of creditworthiness but not sufficient to draw inference against assessee ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3437 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT Vs. Chanakya Developers reported 43 taxmann.com 91 In the …
Addition for bogus purchases as unexplained cash credits whether u/s 68 or u/s 41(1) as cessation of liability? No additions on opening balances ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3382 (2020) (09) ITAT In this case appeal was preferred by the Revenue against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax …
Bank passbook / statements not books of account of assessee and hence no addition can be made u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3381 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Baladin Ram v. CIT 71 ITR 427CIT vs. …
Deeming provision of section 68 not apply if no sum is received in terms of any money, i.e., in cash or cheque. credit worthiness not required to be examined in such case In the given case, the Income Tax Department had challenged the judgment of the Hon’ble High …
Mere TDS deduction not decisive factor to treat payment received as income of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3347 (2020) (07) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Panbari Tea Company Ltd. (1965) 57 ITR 422(SC)Win Chadha vs CIT (International Taxation)Sumati Dayal vs. CIT …
Cash credit entries in books of a firm, in absence of material to indicate that they were its profits, could not be assessed in the hands of the firm ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3304 (2020) (05) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Deputy Commissioner of Income …
Addition u/s 68-mere non-submission of ITR copy no ground for rejecting explanation, when it was demonstrated that loans had already been repaid. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2945 (2019) (05) ITAT The sole grievance of the assessee in this appeal was that the CIT(A) had erred in …
Section 68 is about satisfaction of AO not CIT us 263 to sit on the judgment of Assessing Officer. Revision order can not be made merely on audit objection basis-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1030 (2016) (10) ITAT Important case Laws cited: CIT v. Sohana Woollen Mills – …
