Tag: Unexplained Investment
Addition u/s 69 on the basis of unsigned receipts found during search deleted. Such unsigned receipts could not have been treated incriminating documents ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3251 (2020) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the appellant assessee had challenged the order of the CIT(A) in confirming the …
Addition u/s 69 for unexplained investment on reasoning that no prudent person would keep huge amount of cash in house. ITAT deleted addition ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3233 (2020) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal had been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the …
Addition as unexplained credit/Investment in case of money launderer / hawala operator. Supreme Court dismisses SLP against High Court order ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3089 (2019) (07) SC The Income Tax Department had received information from the Enforcement Directorate (ED) that the appellant assessee had opened various bank …
Without rejecting books of account, it was not proper to make addition towards unexplained investment u/s 69 of the Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2982 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Smt. P.K. Noorjahan’s (237 ITR 570) w The instant appeal …
Addition made for electricity variation with quantum of production deleted. Lower consumption of electricity for the same quantum of production should be viewed positively and not adversely-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2200 (2018) (02) ITAT The Challenge/Grievance: The instant appeal was filed by the Revenue against the …
Addition for investment in land deleted when it was purchased by the company in the name of director to facilitate transfer as per State Laws-High Court Judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2199 (2018) (02) HC The Challenge/Grievance: The Revenue was aggrieved by the decision of the ITAT …
Wife share in house purchased from savings and stridhan accepted by deleting addition made u/s 69B as unexplained investment – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1240 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the disallowance made …
Addition for Unexplained Investment u/s 69 quashed as Muslims religion bars Interest income therefore cash was kept at home INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW ITA No.697/LKW/2015 Assessment year:2010-11 Mehrun Nisha (Appellant) vs. Income Tax Officer (Respondent) Date of Order: 04-03-2016 ORDER PER A. K. GARODIA, A.M. This is …
