Day: August 30, 2020
Whether an expenditure is capital or revenue squarely fall within the ambit of a debatable issue. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3379 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Vegan International Ltd. 2 Taxmann.com 140 In the instant case, the …
Depreciation allowable even if asset not used during the year when it formed part of block of assets ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3378 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Norplex Oak India reported in 198 Taxman 0470 In the instant case, the …
Reassessment completed without serving notice u/s 143(2) invalid. Issue and service of notice are jurisdictional requirements ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3377 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Chetan Gupta 382 ITR 613 In the instant case, the assessee had raised additional grounds …
CBDT asks banks to refund charges collected on or after 01.01.2020 on transactions done using electronic modes prescribed u/s 269SU F.No.370142/35/2019-TPL-PtGovernment of IndiaMinistry of FinanceDepartment of RevenueCentral Board of Direct Taxes Circular No. 16/2020 Dated: 30th August, 2020 Subject: Imposition of charge on the prescribed electronic modes under section 269SU of the Income-tax …
