Author: administrator

Delay in filing appeal condoned as CA was unaware of law. Quality of-explanation, legal assistance and detriment to Revenue important factors-Madras HC

Delay in filing appeal condoned as CA was unaware of law. Quality of-explanation, legal assistance and detriment to Revenue important factors-Madras HC

March 25, 2017 High Courts, Income Tax, Judgments
Delay in filing appeal condoned as CA was unaware of law. Quality of explanation, legal assistance to litigant, and detriment to Revenue important factors to consider- Madras High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1185 (2017) (03) HC The Moot Question: Can a litigant be prejudiced on account …
CBEC renamed as CBIC for GST Implementation

CBEC renamed as CBIC for GST Implementation

March 25, 2017 GST
CBEC renamed as CBIC for GST implementation  FM approves the re-organisation of the field formations of the Central Board of Excise & Customs (CBEC) for the implementation of Goods & Services Tax (GST); CBEC is being renamed as the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (CBIC), after …
Receipt of ITAT order by any CIT triggers limitation period u/s 260A(2)(a). It refers to only designations which include CIT(Judicial) – Delhi High Court

Receipt of ITAT order by any CIT triggers limitation period u/s 260A(2)(a). It refers to only designations which include CIT(Judicial) – Delhi High Court

March 24, 2017 High Courts, Income Tax, Judgments
Receipt of ITAT order by any CIT triggers limitation period u/s 260A(2)(a). In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court has held that the terms used in the relevant sub-section are the only designations of the officers who could receive a copy of the order. Therefore, in the …

Unclaimed Deposits in Banks and Insurance Companies

March 24, 2017 Press Release
Unclaimed Deposits in Banks and Insurance Companies The details of the unclaimed deposits reported by various banks under Section 26 of Banking Regulation Act (BR Act), 1949 are as follows: As of Unclaimed Deposits (Rs. in crores) 31.12.2013 5124.98 31.12.2014 4998.27 31.12.2015 6835.40 The details of unclaimed amount …
Additions not related to reasons recorded for reopening not permissible as it was not subject matter of reasons recorded by AO for reopening the assessment

Additions not related to reasons recorded for reopening not permissible as it was not subject matter of reasons recorded by AO for reopening the assessment

March 24, 2017 Income Tax, Judgments
Additions not related to reasons recorded for reopening not permissible as it was not subject matter of reasons recorded by AO for reopening the assessment – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1183 (2017) (03) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the additions made by …