Category: ITAT
Double depreciation claim by charitable trust allowed as application of income up to 31-03-2014 as it has been barred u/s 11(6) from AY 2015-16-ITAT ABCAUS Casse Law Citation: 1022 (2016) (09) ITAT AY 2005- 06 and AY 2010-11 Brief Facts of the Case: The present appeal(s) was filed …
Unavoidable circumstances for waiver of interest us 234A also qualify for reduction/waiver of 234B 234C interest as well-Madras High Court. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1021 (2016) (09) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The petitioner assessee filed the present writ petitioner challenges the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) …
No addition on the basis of surrender made at the time of survey. It is to be based on evidences material as unlike section 132(4), survey team not authorised to administer an oath u/s 133A- ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1020 (2016) (09) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: The …
No Vacancy allowance us 23(1)(c) if property actually not let out at all even for a single day during the previous year. There is no anomaly in the Law-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1017 (2016) (09) ITAT Assessment Year: 2009-10 Brief Facts of the Case: The appellant …
CA floated 90 companies for fake accommodation entries. However Reopening u/s 147 held bad as merely based on Investigation Wing Report which is without application of mind. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1015 (2016) (09) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: A search operation u/s 132 of the Income-tax …
Recording two separate reasons for reopening u/s 147 148 bad as it itself shows non-application of mind and assumption of wrong jurisdiction – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1014 (2016) (09) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: In the instant case, the assessee was aggrieved by the order …
No TDS liability us 194C for back to back contract in JV. Joint venture and its constituent members had no contractor or sub-contractor relationship -ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1013 (2016) (09) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: The assessee was an AOP which was forme as a joint …
Commissioner can allow fresh deduction claim u/s 264 under revision petition without requirement of filing of revised income tax return – Kerala High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1012 (2016) (09) HC Important Judgments Cited: Parekh Brothers v. Commissioner of Income Tax Goetze (India} Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax …
Income Tax Appeal tax effect limit do not include cess. Applicability of CBDT instruction for tax effect to be worked out without cess – ITAT ABCAUS Casse Law Citation:1011 2016 (09) ITATAssessment Year: 2010-11Date/Month of Judgment/Order: September, 2016 Brief Facts of the Case: This appeal in question was filed by …
The marginal fall in GP ratio compared to preceding year and non-incurring of expenditure like travelling, telephone, salary, etc. are not the relevant reasons for rejecting of books of accounts under section 145 of the Income Tax Act – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1010 2016 (09) ITAT …
