Category: ITAT
Partners remuneration / interest on capital allowable from estimated profit. ITAT allows deductions following decision of Jurisdictional High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3212 (2019) (12) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Vijay Constructions 213 CTR 105M/s B. Durga Reddy & Co.M/s. K. Venkata Raju, Rajahmundry …
No merit in holding that estimated addition has to be made on account of fall in gross profit rate. ITAT deleted addition ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3211 (2019) (12) ITAT In the instant case, appeal was filed by assessee against the order of CIT(A) on the issue of …
When cash deposit was fully explained no peak credit addition was required as directed by ITAT while remitting the matter back to Assessing Officer ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3210 (2019) (12) ITAT The single issue involved in the instant case was confirmation by the CIT(A)of the addition made …
Penalty 271B deleted as accountant had to look after business activities due to assessee neurological problem. Hence he failed to coordinate with Auditor’s office ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3207 (2019) (12) ITAT In the instant case the appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the …
Addition for bogus purchase deleted as AO conducted enquiry u/s 133(6) from the different supplier having name similar to actual creditor ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3206 (2019) (12) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A) on the solitary …
Doctors retainership fee held taxable as professional income not salary. The agreement demonstrated no master-servant relationship ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3205 (2019) (12) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:ACIT vs. Fortis Healthcare Ltd., 157 ITD 746ITO vs. Apollo Hospitals International Ltd., 64 SOT 302CIT vs. …
Revision u/s 263 done on issues not covered under limited scrutiny quashed as AO had already verified those issues for which limited scrutiny was conducted. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3201 (2019) (12) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd., (2000) 243 ITR 83(SC) …
Income Tax Act is welfare not penal legislation. intention is to provide benefit of doubt to assessee in the given facts and circumstances ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3200 (2019) (12) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal was preferred by the assessee against the order of the CIT(Appeals). …
Failure of AO to apply/examine applicability of section 184(5) makes the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3198 (2019) (12) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Mubarak Trading Co. v/s CIT, 174 Taxman 339Mas Properties & Developers v/s …
Reassessment u/s 148 due to credit card payment. ITAT directed AO to delete the addition made in view of returned income of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3197A (2019) (12) ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A) in the …