Category: ITAT
No question to supply reasons recorded unless return is filed u/s 148. ITAT dismissed the ground never raised before the authorities below ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3086 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Union of India & Others vs. Rai Singh Deb Singh Bist …
Allowability of service tax written off to PL Account when input credit not allowed under Cenvat Credit Rules. ITAT deleted the addition ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3085 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:T. R. F. Ltd. vs. CIT: 323 ITR 397 The Revenue …
Neither assessee can withdraw appeal nor CIT(A) can dismiss appeal for non-prosecution. ITAT explains the powers and duty of the First Appellate Authority. Dismisses of appeal by CIT(A) for non-prosecution results as withdrawal of appeal which is not permitted. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3084 (2019) (07) ITAT Important …
Salary accrued to non-resident for services rendered outside India not taxable and included in the total income. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3079 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Utanka Roy vs. DCIT & Others reported in 390 ITR 109 (Cal) The instant appeal by …
Good Work Reward to employee held not constituting bonus u/s 36(1)(ii) and allowable as normal business expenditure u/s 37 of the Act. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3078 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Shriram Pistons & Rings Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, (2008) …
Claim for exemption u/s 54B allowed though not made in the return of income. AO had disallowed claim as revised return was not filed ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3077 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:M/s. Goetze India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT 284 ITR …
No disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for short deduction of TDS made at less than prescribed rates. ITAT deleted addition following various judgments of High Courts. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3076 (2019) (07) ITAT DCIT vs. Chandabhoy reported in (2012) 17 taxmann. Com 158 (Mum.)CIT-LTU vs. HewlettPackard India Sales (P.) …
Merely making cash payments cannot be a ground for disallowance if section 40A(3) not violated or no defects were found in books of accounts/bills & vouchers ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3075 (2019) (07) ITAT The assessee had challenged the order of CIT(A) in sustaining the part disallowance out …
Disallowance u/s 40A(3) of payment of partners salary in cash. ITAT remands the case in view of Supreme Court judgment relied upon by the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3074 (2019) (07) ITAT The appeal filed by the assessee firm was directed against the exparte order of …
Disallowance u/s 40A(2) for unreasonable increase in directors remuneration deleted as AO not carried out exercise to determine fair remuneration in the similar line and scale of business. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3072 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. …