Category: Judgments
When entire investment/payments for flat purchase was made by the assessee in the name of his daughter, the capital gain was liable to be assessed in the hands of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2705 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Sanjeev Lal v. …
Gypsum board is covered in amended Entry 56 Schedule IV of RVAT, read as ‘gypsum in all its forms’-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2704 (2019) (01) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mumbai v. India Gypsum Ltd. Trutuf Safety Glass Industries v. …
Merely because some of vouchers did not bear the truck number or driver’s name the transport expenses was not ingenuine – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2703 (2019) (01) ITAT The appellant assessee, a Govt. contractor, was aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A) in confirming the lump …
Higher Court cannot stay /quash orders in anticipation of being passed by an appellate authority. Supreme Court quashes High Court direction ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2702 (2019) (01) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:Awani Kumar Upadhyay vs. High Court of Judicature of Allahabad & Ors., (2013) 12 SCC 392 An FIR was registered by the State Excise Department …
Tribunal declined to issue direction to AO to reopen cases under section 147 as Department have enough powers u/s 147, 263 and 154 to tax escaped income ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2701 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: ITO Vs. Muralidhar Bhagwan das 52 ITR …
Reopening limitation period not stood extended merely for passing reference made by the ITAT when assessee was not a party to the case and was not given opportunity of being heard. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2700 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Rural Electrification Corporation …
Market value of property with encroachment would always be lower – ITAT directs adoption of valuation u/s 50C prevalent on the date of agreement to sale ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2699 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:Dara Singh Vs. ITO Ward-1(2), Ghaziabad and ITA No.2213/Del/2018Sanjeev Lal …
When assessee surrendered exemption claimed on the condition that penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) are not initiated there was no question of concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2698 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT vs. Manjunatha …
Charges for Conversion of residential house usage to commercial revenue expenses as they are incurred on year-to-year basis and nor result in enduring benefit – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2697 (2019) (01) ITAT The appeal by the assessee was directed against order passed by the Commissioner of …
CIT(A) in cryptic order can not reject reconciliation of difference between gross receipts and Form No. 26AS filed before him on the ground that it did not resolve. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2696 (2019) (01) ITAT The instant appeal by the assessee was directed against the order of …
