Category: Judgments

CIT Appeals order passed ex parte without giving another opportunity or mentioning reasons for additions sustained is bad

CIT Appeals order passed ex parte without giving another opportunity or mentioning reasons for additions sustained is bad INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH ‘A’, KOLKATA ITA No. 766/Kol/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2009-2010 Asish Ranjan Chowdhury (APPELLANT)  vs. I.T.O. (RESPONDENT) Date of Order: 11/03/2016 ORDER Per Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, J.M. …

CIT Revision u/s 263 unjustified that income surrendered u/s 133A to be taxed separately u/s 69A not as business income

CIT Revision u/s 263 unjustified alleging wiping out income surrendered u/s 133A treating it business income and not separately u/s 69A INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR I.T.A No. 203(Asr)/2014 Assessment Year: 2009-10 M/s Superfine Agro Industries (Appellant) vs. Income Tax Officer (Respondent) Date of Order: 10/03/2016 ORDER PER T. …

Revision u/s 263 not justified in case of best judgment assessment u/s 144 for non co-operation by assessee

Revision u/s 263 not justified in case of best judgment assessment u/s 144 for non co-operation by assessee INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR I.T.A No. 220(Asr)/2015 Assessment Year: 2010-11 M/s Sutlej Wine Enterprises (Appellant) vs. PrCIT (Respondent) Date of Order: 10/03/2016 ORDER PER T. S. KAPOOR (AM): …

Section 79 not apply to carry forward & set off of unabsorbed depreciation in case of change in shareholding

Section 79 do not apply to carry forward and set off of unabsorbed depreciation in case of change in shareholding INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCH ‘A’, BANGALORE I.T(TP).A No.635/Bang/2015 (Assessment Year : 2009-10) M/s. Swiss Re Healthcare Services P. Ltd ….. Appellant  vs. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax …Respondent Date …