Category: Judgments
Carry forward set off charitable loss us 11 12 allowed by ITAT despite there being no such provisions but for the various decisions of High Courts ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1040 (2016) (10) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: The respondent assessee was a charitable society. The income …
Courts power confined to examine arbitration agreement existence only after amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996-Delhi High Court. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1039 (2016) (10) HC Important Case Law Referred: Radhakrishnan v. M/s. Maestro Engineers & Ors. (2009) (13) SCALE 403 Brief Facts of the Case: …
Polished granite slab used on floor is not tile under Karnataka Sales Tax Act Entry 8. that there is a distinction between polished granite stone or slabs and tiles-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1038 (2016) (10) SC Important Case Law Referred: M/s. Vishwakarma Granites v. Commissioner of …
Rakhi Sawant income tax appeals gets both relief and dismissal from ITAT-dismissal for delay, disallowance us 40(a)(ia) remanded assessee being not covered u/s 44AB ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1037 (2016) (10) ITAT Appeal-1 dismissed for dealy There was a delay of 704 days for filing the appeal. The …
Penalty for late filing TDS return us 272A(2)(k) quashed as accountant had changed during the year and assessee was not aware of the delay. In a latest judgment, ITAT Mumbai quashed the penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) for late filing TDS return quashed as accountant had changed during the year …
Partnership salary allowed in profit loss ratio as per deed. Remuneration clause provided the manner of quantifying as per CBDT Circular No. 739 – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Ctation 1035 (2016)(10) ITAT Important Judgments Cited: Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s. DCS International Trading Durga Dass Davki …
No Penalty 271(1)(c) even if quantum proceedings upheld additions. Merely because a bona fide explanation did not find favour, it would not justify the levy of concealment penalty-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1034 (2016) (10) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: A search operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, …
Income Tax Department vindictively disallowed agricultural income claim of Jayalalithaa. Sasikala also gets relief from ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1033 (2016) (10) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case(s): In both the cases, among other thing, the claim of agricultural income was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO) …
No income concealment us 271(1(c) on gift under explanation 5A. NSC declared us 153A was received as inheriting, gift from father, grandfather-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1032 (2016) (10) ITAT Important case law cited: Sheraton Apparels Vs. ACIT (2002) 256 ITR 20 Brief Facts of the Case: The …
Bogus share capital entry to obtain bank loan. Addition made u/s 68 remanded back to verify facts in view of re-casted and revised audited balance sheet and ROC filing-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1031 (2016) (10) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: The was a provate limited company …
