Category: Supreme Court
The Show cause notice issued for change in excise classification of goods was barred by limitation, as it was intimated – SC dismissed appeal of the Department ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2853 (2019) (04) SC The appellant had changed the goods classification under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. …
High Court was not justified in appointing independent arbitrator without resorting to procedure for appointment of arbitrator under the contract as agreed by the parties.- SC ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2851 (2019) (03) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Boghara Polyfab Private Limited caseUnion of India & Another Vs. M.P. Gupta In …
Total turnover u/s 6B(1) of Karnataka Sales Tax Act does not mean taxable turnover for levy of turnover tax – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2848 (2019) (03) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Commissioner of Customs Vs. Dilip Kumar and Company and Others 2018(9) SCCIndra Das Vs. State of Assam 2011(3) SCC 380 and RakeshKumar Paul Vs. State of Assam 2017(15) SCC 67M/s. Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Others Vs. State of Bihar and Others 1983(4) SCC 45 The …
Entity exempt from excise duty not liable to pay NCCD, Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2847 (2019) (03) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Guwahati …
SIFO investigation does not come to an end even after expiry of period within which a report has to be submitted u/s 212(3) of the Companies Act 2013 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2846 (2019) (03) SC Under Section 212(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 (2013 Act) where …
Excluded employee under EPF Act/Scheme 1952-Supreme Court explains that employee who withdraw accumulations from GPF/ other Funds not covered in the definition ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2845 (2019) (03) SC The basic question that arose for determination in the instant case was as to whether the retired …
Mobile Crane Wire Rope an essential part of Mobile Crane and therefore, taxable at the rates prescribed for the Mobile Crane under Rajasthan VAT – SC ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2844 (2019) (03) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties M/s Annapurna Carbon Industries vs. State …
Lack of full declaration in Form 10 of accumulation u/s 11(2) by itself would not be fatal to the claim. Supreme Court dismisses SLP of the Revenue ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2842 (2019) (03) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT v. Hostel and …
No disallowance u/s 43B for unpaid service tax unless actually received. Supreme Court dismisses the SLP of the Income Tax Department ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2827 (2019) (03) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Commissioner of IncomeTax v. Ovira Logistics P. Ltd 377 ITR …
High Court erred in dismissing appeal of Revenue as infructuous because respondent company had been struck off by the RoC – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2825 (2019) (03) SC The instant appeal was filed by the appellant Revenue against the order of the High Court …