CBDT prescribes Form/manner of furnishing undertaking u/s section 119 of Finance Act 2012
INISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
Notification No. 120/2021
New Delhi, the 13th October, 2021
INCOME-TAX
G.S.R.737(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by the first provisio to section 119 of Finance Act, 2012 (23 of 2012), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules, namely:-
1.Short title and commencement.
(1) These rules may be called the Relaxation of Validation (section 119of the Finance Act, 2012) Rules, 2021.
(2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.2.
Form and manner of furnishing undertaking under first proviso to section 119.
The form and manner of furnishing undertaking under Explanation to fifth and sixth proviso to Explanation 5to clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 9of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43of 1961), as prescribed under sub-rule (1) and sub-rule (3) of rule 11UE and rule 11UF of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, shall mutatis mutandis apply to clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of the first proviso to section 119of the Finance Act, 2012 (23of 2012).
3. Conditions under clause (iv) of first proviso to section 119.-The conditions for the purposes of clause (iv) of the Explanation to fifth and sixth proviso to Explanation 5 to clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), as prescribed under sub-rule (2) of rule 11UE of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, shall mutatis mutandis apply to clause (iv) of the first proviso to section 119of the Finance Act, 2012 (23 of 2012).
[F. No. 370142/47/2021-TPL]
NEHA SAHAY, Under Secy.
(Tax Policy and Legislation)
Download Notification CBDT Notification No. 120/2021 Click Here >>
- FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied
- Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company
- Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court
- High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA
- Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it
