Tag: additions u/s 68
Expression “any previous year” in Section 68 refers to previous year relevant to the Assessment Year in question – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3287 (2020) (03) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Commissioner of Income-Tax, Poona Vs. Bhaichand H. Gandhi, 141 ITR 67Commissioner of …
No Addition u/s 68 to be made as unexplained cash credit if loan creditor had deposited cash before issue of cheque ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3026 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Orissa Corporation Pvt. Ltd. 159 ITR 78Rohini Builders 256 ITR 360 The …
Addition u/s 68 made without issuing notice to creditors deleted by ITAT as AO failed to conduct inquiry. Had creditors not responded, addition might be justified ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2874 (2019) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee was in appeal before the Tribunal against …
Addition for unexplained cash credit u/s 68 deleted when assessee’s accountant wrongly passed such entries in the books of accounts ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2798 (2019) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had filed the appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income …
Harassing assessee in the pretext of verifying documents futile exercise – ITAT deleted additions u/s 68 made for cash deposits in bank ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2764 (2019) (01) ITAT The appeal of the assessee was directed against the order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income …
Share Capital/Premium can not be regarded as undisclosed income. High Court deleted addition made for share premium u/s 68 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2478 (2018) 08 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Commissioner of Income Tax v. Electro Polychem Ltd. (2007) 294 ITR 661, Commissioner of Income …
Explanation can not be rejected applying prudent mans behaviour test. High Court deletes addition made for cash deposits applying Principle of preponderance of probability ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2261 (2018) (03) HC The appellant assessee had challenged the order of the ITAT in confirming the addition under …
Assessee cannot be penalized for non response or non attendance by creditors in response to notice when all details regarding creditors were furnished discharging the onus. If some enquiry was not completed by AO, the CIT(A) could have also undertaken necessary exercise-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2175 …
Execution of registered sale deed adjusting cash credit entries in books establishes identity of depositors of money beyond doubt-High Court upheld deletion of additions made u/s 68 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2140 (2017) (12) HC The Challenge/Grievance: This instant appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section …
In a latest judgment, ITAT Chennai has quashed penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment holding that there is a difference in “facts not proved” and “facts disproved” and penalty can be levied only for the latter. Case Law Details: ITA No.1730/Mds./2015 Assessment Year :2010-11 Mr.R.A.Palanisamy vs. Income Tax Officer Date of …
