Tag: business loss u/s 37(1)
Loss incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law is not deductible irrespective of legality or illegality of the business – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3717 (2023) (04) SC Important Case Laws relied upon:CIT vs. Piara Singh 124 ITR 41Haji …
If business not closed down, expenses allowed u/s 37(1) even if turnover was low as it was temporary lull which assessee was trying to revive – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3113 (2019) (08) ITAT The instant appeal had been filed by the assessee against impugned order passed …
Forfeiture of deposit on account of cancellation of lease allowed as business loss u/s 28 being incidental to regular business carried on by the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 3023 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT vs. Mysore Sugar Co. Ltd., …
Disallowance u/s 37(1) for pan masala seized deleted following SC decision that Explanation 1 apply to business expenses not to business losses ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2979 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: T.A. Quereshi Vs. CIT (2006) 286 ITR 547 The …
Loss by shop burglary arisen during the course of business allowed u/s 37(1) even when Insurance company assessed loss at lower amount – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2859 (2019) (04) ITAT This appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax …
Amount forfeited on default of installment for purchase of property was capital in nature as the amount was fixed irrespective of which installment the assessee failed to pay – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2833 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Commissioner …
Claim for business loss due to theft of cash allowed despite no FIR was lodged with Police Authorities in view of peculiar circumstances and also when Revenue had not suffered ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2635 (2018) (11) ITAT The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order of …
Security deposit written off allowed as business loss us 37(1) even though rent security w/o in books was claimed wrongly as bad debts u/s 36-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1059 (2016) (11) ITAT A.Y : 2010-11 Important Case Laws considered: Fab India Overseas P. Ltd. vs. ACIT CIT …
Unrecoverable out of pocket expenses allowable u/s 37(1) as business loss though not admissible as bad debts written off u/s s 36(1)(vii) – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:973 2016 (07) ITATAssessment Year: 2010-11Date/Month of Judgment: July 2016 Brief Facts of the Case:The assessee firm was engaged in rendering legal services including …