Tag: cash credits
Cash deposits by CA stated to be trading income added as unexplained income u/s 68 as ICAI does not allow CAs to do any business activity ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3574 (2022) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) …
Ex parte best judgment assessment remanded as the assessee was a defunct company which ceased to function and therefore could not submit documents ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3531 (2021) (07) ITAT In this case appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A) confirming addition …
Opening balance of loan creditor brought forward from preceding year cannot be treated as unexplained cash credit or bogus credit ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3492 (2021) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming an addition on account …
Addition u/s 68 for cash deposit prior to issue of cheque by lender deleted as deposit was out of cash withdrawn earlier ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3490 (2021) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition u/s …
Addition made for difference due to wrong journal entry. Assessee directed to file reconciliation to explain the difference-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3477 (2021) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by the Assessing …
ITAT remanded invocation of Section 115BBE denying set off of current year loss against income assessed u/s 68. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3470 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Sumati Dayal v. CIT reported in (1995) 214 ITR 801(SC)CIT v. Durga Prasad More (1971) 82 ITR 540 …
Addition u/s 68 for cash deposited in bank during demonetization period deleted as cash was deposited by trade debtors ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3465 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Malpani House of Stones Vs CIT (88 taxmaann.com 546) (Raj HC)CIT vs Aggarwal Engg Co. (302 ITR …
Non-filing of ITRs by lenders can give rise to suspicion for the lack of creditworthiness but not sufficient to draw inference against assessee ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3437 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT Vs. Chanakya Developers reported 43 taxmann.com 91 In the …
Bank passbook / statements not books of account of assessee and hence no addition can be made u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3381 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Baladin Ram v. CIT 71 ITR 427CIT vs. …
Addition for unsecured loans tenable when profits are estimated as it is not trading account but balance sheet item ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3368 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Addl. CIT vs Hanuman Agarwal 151 ITR 150 (Pat)Mather & Platt (India) Ltd vs …
