Tag: disallowance u/s 37(1)
Expenditure incurred on discontinued business unless shown to be incurred for reviving it not allowable under section 37(1) – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2901 (2019) (05) ITAT The sole issue raised by the assessee was the maintainability of the disallowance of expenditure incurred for maintenance …
Loss by shop burglary arisen during the course of business allowed u/s 37(1) even when Insurance company assessed loss at lower amount – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2859 (2019) (04) ITAT This appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax …
Allowability u/s 37(1) of fine /penalty for redemption of goods ordered to be confiscated for breach of import conditions – High Court explains the Law ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2801 (2019) (02) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT V/s. Ahmedabad Cotton Mfg. Co Ltd. …
Foreign education expenses of director allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1) being incurred in furtherance of assessee’s business interest ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2641 (2018) (11) ITAT The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in inter alia …
Penalty imposed by Supreme Court for illegal mining held compensatory in nature and allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1) of the Income Tax Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2600 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Essel Mining & Industries Ltd vs. Addl. CIT ACIT vs. …
Presumption that commission cannot be paid for purchase wrong. No evidence that commission came back to assessee or agents were related parties – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2533 (2018) 09 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Inbuilt Merchants …
Interest for late payment of service tax not penal in nature but only compensatory. ITAT deletes disallowance made under section 37 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2465 (2018) 08 The instant appeal was filed by the assessee directed against CIT(A)’s order in holding that the interest on delayed …
Commission paid to represent assessee before govt agencies for getting work held not an offence u/s 37(1) – ITAT Judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2447 (2018) 08 ITAT The instant appeal by the assessee was directed against the order of CIT(Appeals) in confirming inter alia the disallowance …
RBI penalty for clerical mistakes not disallowable u/s 37. The genuine clerical mistake cannot be treated as an offense under the Banking Regulations Act – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 2364 (2018) 06 ITAT The instant appeal was preferred by the assessee against the order of the …
Deduction for Penal excise was allowed u/s 37 as it was paid in discharging contractual obligation to indemnify department for violating terms of affidavit ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2222 (2018) (02) HC The respondent assessee was engaged in the business of manufacturing and its sale. An intending …