Tag: Search & Seizure
Statement recorded u/s 132(4) is not sacrosanct merely because assessee failed to demonstrate any coercion and duress – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3708 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in upholding the addition of undisclosed income …
Mere providing evidence relied upon by AO no substitute of fundamental right of opportunity for cross-examination – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3705 (2023) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Andaman Timber Industries vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, 314 ELT 641 (SC)I.C.D.S. Ltd. vs CIT 273 …
Amendment to Section 153C vide Finance Act, 2015 applicable to searches conducted u/s 132 before 01.06.2015 – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3698 (2023) (04) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Pepsico India Holdings Private Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, 2014 SCC OnLine Del …
Onus to explain investment sources by wife discharged when she and her husband both admitted that husbands paid the money – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3644 (2023) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the addition …
Non searched persons liable to pay interest on late filing of return u/s 158BC even in absence of a notice u/s 158BC and even for the period prior to 01.06.1999 – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 3643 (2023) (01) SC Important Case Laws relied upon:Mathuram Agrawal …
Jewellery can not be held unexplained simply because weight of Gold coins was not stated in the Will and only number of gold coins were mentioned ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3570 (2022) (01) ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that Jewellery can not be held unexplained …
CIT approval u/s 153D in bulk draft assessment orders on a single day held to be mechanical approval vitiating entire proceedings. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3555 (2021) (10) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Shri Navin Jain vs. DCIT In the instant case the assessee had taken an additional …
Data retrieved from Pen-drive and admission by vendors though may have a persuasive value no substantive evidentiary value to make additions. Data retrieved from digital device certificate u/s 65B(4) of Evidence Act must prove its authenticity. In the instant case, the assessee had cjhallenged the order passed by …
Addition for undisclosed foreign bank account deleted as the information received in pen drive under DTAC lacked basic essentials of a bank statement. In the instant case, the assessee was aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A) confirming the addition u/s 69 of the Income Tax Act, …
Addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposited in bank account of the assessee in excess of his yearly salary income deleted In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in upholding the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) towards the difference …
