Tag: Section 263
Notice u/s 263 issued by AO was held valid when notice itself stated that PCIT directed its issuance and AO signed it merely in his ministerial capacity ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3081 (2019) (07) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:CIT Vs. Amitabh Bachchan, (2016) 384 …
No Revision u/s 263 when assessment order was void and did not exist in law for not following procedure laid down by Supreme Court in GKN Drivesshaft ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 3049 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT Vs. VSNL (2012) …
CIT is empowered to invoke revisionry powers u/s 263 to direct AO to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2687 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:CIT Vs. Ashok ConstructionsCIT Vs. Surendra Prasad AgarwalV. Ramanamurthy RajuStar Diamond Tools Vs. ITOCIT Vs. Paramanand …
No mandatory show cause notice requirement us 263-SC. Only reasonable opportunity of hearing to be afforded to the assessee The Supreme Court in its latest judgment delivered in the case of legendary Indian Movie actor Amitabh Bachchan (Big-B) has upheld and restored the CIT revisionary order u/s 263 …
Assessment in pursuance of order u/s 263 based on a judgement subsequent to the date of original assessment cannot be basis for estimation of higher rate of net profit. Case Details: ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM I.T.A.No.458/Vizag/2012 Assessment Year: 2006-07 ACIT vs. Padmavathi Transports Date of Order: 18/03/2016 Brief Facts of the Case: …