Business or House Property income-Onus was on assessee to show that out of income or substantial income was from letting out of the property being principal business activity – SC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1249 (2017) (05) SC Date/Month of Pronouncement: May, 2017 Important Case Laws Cited relied upon:
Section 14A applies to dividend income u/s 115-O on which tax is paid by the dividend paying company-Supreme Court explains ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1235 (2017) (05) SC The issue: The issue in the present appeal was related to the admissibility or otherwise of deduction of expenditure incurred
Disallowance us 40(a)(ia) applies to amounts paid also-Supreme Court. Allahabad HC judgment holding that it applies to amount payable at the year end overruled ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1227 (2017) (04) SC Date/Month of Pronouncement: May, 2017 The Controversy-Section 40(a)(ia) applies to sums paid or payable? Section 40(a)(ia)
Subrata Roy ready to go to Jail if cheques dishonours Recently, Supreme Court had ordered auction of Sahara Aamby Valley and warned Subrata Roy to be present in the Court on 27th April, 2017 not to honour his affidavit or face wrath of Law. On the scheduled day, in
Linking of Aadhaar to PAN-Judgment expected tomorrow when hearing resumes The The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has part heard the matter on the linking of Aadhaar to Income tax Permanent Account Number (PAN) as per newly inserted section 139AA of the Income tax Act, 1961. The hearing was
Filing false complaints against husband amounts to cruelty. Such Acts of Wife have effect of lowering his reputation in the eyes of his peer- Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1221 (2017) (04) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa 2013 (5) SCC 226.
Let justice be done though the heavens fall-Supreme Court explains the ambit of Article 142 of the Constitution viz-a-viz powers of the Apex Court ABCAUS Case law Citation: 1218 (2017)(04) SC Important Case Law Cited/referred A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak & Another, (1988) 2 SCC 602, Supreme Court Bar