Showing trade discounts in tax Invoice not compulsory. Credit notes eligible under Rule 3(2)(c) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules 2005-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1105 (2017) (01) SC Important Case Laws Cited: State of Karnataka vs. M/s Kitchen Appliances India Ltd. M/s Southern Motors vs.
ITAT jurisdiction to examine validity of search SC to decide ITAT jurisdiction to examine validity of search and demand satisfaction note, other evidences on the basis of which search was conducted. In an ongoing litigation in I.A. 2/2016 in Civil Appeal No(s).2734/2013 filed by the Revenue, the latest hearing
Payments to HUF held deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) because the prescribed conditions were fulfilled notwithstanding the fact that the HUF itself was not the registered shareholder of the company-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1095 (2017) (01) SC Assessment Year : 2006-07 Important Case Laws Cited: Binal Sevantilal Koradia
Writ court justified interfering with disciplinary enquiry and orders if it suffers from violation of principles of natural justice or exhibit non-application of mind or non-recording of reasons by the Enquiry Officer or the Disciplinary Authority-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1094 (2017) (01) SC Important Case Laws
Stage of deduction us 10A is at gross total income computation of eligible undertaking under Chapter IV, not at computation of total income under Chapter VI-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1093 (2017) (01) SC Important Case Laws cited: Tata Power Co. Ltd. vs. Reliance Energy Ltd (SC)
Airport security checks not issues of prestige-Supreme Court quashes Rajasthan High Court order to grant exemption to HC Judges and direction to UOI to form National Security Policy ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1083 (2016) (12) SC Brief Facts of the Case: A Division Bench of the Rajasthan High
Person with disabilities need not stand-up for National Anthem. Doors of Cinema Halls need not be bolted-Supreme Court modifies its order. ABCAUS case Law Citation: 1079 (2016)(12) SC On 30th November-2016, The Hon’ble Supreme Court had as interim measure, issued several directions with respect to playing of National Anthem