Category: Income Tax
No penalty u/s 271D can be levied when cash loans were treated as undisclosed income of the assessee u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2743 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Diwan Enterprises vs. CIT CIT vs. Standard …
Reopening of assessment for past years on account of the cancellation of Registration u/s 12AA is not permissible unless registration was obtained by fraud, collusion or concealment of any material fact ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2742 (2019) (01) HC The Petitioner had filed the instant Petition against the …
Have you done High Value Transactions in F Y 2017-18 but haven’t filed ITR Yet? CBDT Advisory Income Tax Department has issued an advisory stating that many persons who have done high-value transactions in F. Y. 2017-18, but not yet filed Income Tax Return for the corresponding Asst. …
Prosecution u/s 278B without proof of service of notice u/s 2(35) expressing intention treating a person as Principal Officer of the Company quashed ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2740 (2019) (01) AC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:V.P. Punj Vs. Asstt. CIT, 2001, 119 TAXMAN 543 Delhi, Sushil Suri and Ors. Vs. State & Ors. (2008) 303 ITR 86 Madhumilan Syntex Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Union of India (SC)Greatway (P) Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Asstt. CIT, 199 ITR 391 (P&C),ITO Vs. Roshini Cold Storage (P) Ltd. and Ors., (2000) 245 ITR 322 (Mad)Income Tax …
ITAT analyses validity of notice u/s 143(2) by non jurisdictional AO. On objection, AO obligated to refer matter for determination of jurisdiction u/s 124(2) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2739 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: ACIT Vs. Hotel Blue Moon (2010) 321 ITR 362 (SC) …
When assessee during assessment proceedings voluntarily admitted mistake then mere absence of revised return would not justify penalty u/s 271(1)(c) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2738 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT Vs. Man Industries Ltd.(2018) 164 DTR (Bom) 165 CIT Vs. Somany Evergreen Knits …
Non application of section 56(2)(viia) to fresh issue of shares contrary to express provisions and legislative intent – CBDT clarifies again Circular No. 03/2019 F.No. 173/616/2018-ITA.IGovernment of IndiaMinistry of FinanceDepartment of Revenue(Central Board of Direct Taxes) North Block, New Delhi,Dated the 21st January, 2019 Subject: Applicability of section …
For discrepancy in salary figure between Form No. 16 and 26AS it cannot be said that the assessee has concealed amount or furnished inaccurate particulars of income – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2737 (2019) (01) ITAT During scrutiny proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, …
CBDT gives 21 days time to ITR non-filers to file their returns for AY 2018-19 CBDT identifies non-filers through Non-filers Monitoring System (NMS) by using Data Analytics and request the Non-filers to assess their tax liability for AY 2018-19 and file the Income Tax Returns (ITR) or submit …
Revised computation of deduction u/s 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 permissible having regard to Section 10A (5) and Section 80A(5) of the Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2736 (2019) (01) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Goetze (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2006) …
