Category: ITAT
Addition made for low house hold withdrawals from capital upheld by ITAT rejecting the explanation of of joint family living and expenses ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2492 (2018) 08 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the appellant assessee against the order of the CIT(A) in inter …
Booking of flat is not date of acquisition for claim of capital gain exemption u/s 54F. ITAT upheld denial of exemption as asset was not held for more than 3 years ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2490 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: …
Renovation is part of cost of acquisition for grant of benefit of deduction u/s 54F. Term residential house include all amenities to make it habitable-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2489 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Mrs. Rahana Siraj Vs. CIT (2015) …
Capital gain Exemption u/s 54 can not be denied for new property purchased in joint names of self wife & daughter when the amount was actually invested-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2481 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT vs. Kamal Wahal (2013) 351 ITR …
Date of Agreement to purchase taken as date of acquisition for grant of exemption u/s 54F. Section 2(47) not stipulates registration as mandatory condition ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2480 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Poddar Cement 225 1TR 675 and Mysore Minerals 275ITR 775. …
Procedure for valuation of inventory from tag price during survey u/s 133A-Cost price has to be determined and due deduction to be given towards direct expenses – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2477 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son, …
Payments made by University to affiliated colleges for conducting examinations in different centres were reimbursement and not fee for technical services u/s 194J – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2476 (2018) 08 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of …
The jurisdiction cannot be challenged after expiry of time limit prescribed u/s 124(3). The challenge to jurisdiction is different from challenge to transfer of jurisdiction – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2475 (2018) 08 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of …
AO was not justified in applying accounting method followed by a different assessee and rejecting Percentage of completion method consistently applied which had been accepted by Revenue in past- ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2474 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Investment Ltd V/s CIT …
Non deduction of TDS-Liability to pay interest even if deductee paid taxes. Under section 201(1A) liability of the deductor is absolute – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2472 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/referred: DIT vs. Jacabs Civil Incorporate In the instant appeal, the assessee had …
