Category: ITAT
Advance taken in cash against sale not loan or deposit u/s 269SS hence no penalty us/ 271D is leviable on the assessee ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3447 (2021) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in sustaining the order …
Annual letting value of property u/s 23(1)(a) on the basis of Municipal Valuation accepted by ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3445 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law relied referred:CIT v/s Mani Kumar Subba (2011 333 ITR 838)CIT v/s Tip Top Typography (2014 368 ITR 330) In the instant …
Filing belated return & non-registration u/s 12AA no valid reasons to issue notice u/s 148 in absence of other tangible material other than return filed ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3442 (2021) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in …
Expenditure incurred by the assessee towards replacement of machinery with new machinery constitutes a capital expenditure. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3441 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law relied referred:CIT vs. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills P. Ltd, 315 ITR 114CIT vs. Sarvana Spinning Mills Ltd., 293 ITR 201.Elgi Equipments Ltd. …
Penalty u/s 271E deleted when loan was paid in cash to avoid default effecting CIBIL score as signed cheque books were not available with staff ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3439 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Hindustan Steel Ltd. vs State of Orissa reported in (1972) 083 …
Reassessment held bad in law as assessee not given four weeks time to seek legal remedy after rejection of objections to reopening ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3438 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Smt. Kamlesh Goel vs. Income Tax OfficerPr. CIT vs. Sagar DeveloperBharat …
Non-filing of ITRs by lenders can give rise to suspicion for the lack of creditworthiness but not sufficient to draw inference against assessee ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3437 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT Vs. Chanakya Developers reported 43 taxmann.com 91 In the …
Claim of agricultural income allowed in view of ownership of large land, girdwari and village sarpanch certificate ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3436 (2021) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in part confirming the additions made by the Assessing …
Even a single transaction may constitute business as defined in section 2(13) of the Income Tax Act ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3435 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:ITO vs. Amrit Foods (P) Ltd. (1984) 10 ITD 681 In the instant case, the assessee …
Some tax evasion sought by assessee is a necessary condition for imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c). What has to be shown is whether, and if so, how, assessee can be said to have sought to evade tax. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3433 (2021) (01) ITAT Important case law …