Category: ITAT
Hoarding expenses allowed as revenue in nature and not capital. Hoardings are subjected to vagaries of rain, storm, damages etc. and part normal activities of advertisements and publicity business. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2986 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: M/s Empress …
FMV of property on lease to be determined by applying rent capitalization method taking the rent actually received by the assessee and not the fair market rent – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2985 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Kerala v. Hassan Koya, …
Rigorous imprisonment awarded u/s 276B for delayed late deposit of TDS. Assessee had culpable mental state as he remained absent before the authorities and also not filed application for compounding ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2984 (2019) (06) AC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Gopal Engineering V/s …
Addition u/s 40(a)(ia) in rectification proceedings u/s 154 upheld as question of second proviso being prospective was not debatable in view of jurisdiction High Court decision ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2983 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT vs. Ansal Landmark Townships …
Without rejecting books of account, it was not proper to make addition towards unexplained investment u/s 69 of the Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2982 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Smt. P.K. Noorjahan’s (237 ITR 570) w The instant appeal …
Purchasing many small properties itself not good enough reason to hold that it was a business transaction. The quantum or number or number of investments i.e. whether the assessee invested in a single property or in many small properties to get better appreciation, does not change the nature …
Sericulture income from sale of cocoons taxed @ 50% being not agricultural income following judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2980 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: L. Basavaraj Vs. ACIT (2015) 61 taxmann.com 67 (Karn) Lakshmanan & …
Disallowance u/s 37(1) for pan masala seized deleted following SC decision that Explanation 1 apply to business expenses not to business losses ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2979 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: T.A. Quereshi Vs. CIT (2006) 286 ITR 547 The …
Addition for cash deposit deleted as cash withdrawals, redeposit took place during the year itself, there was no question of making addition ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2978 (2019) (05) ITAT The appeal by the assessee was directed against the order passed by the CIT(A) against the confirmation …
Notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO of non jurisdictional ward and consequent assessment framed was invalid and hence both quashed ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2977 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Hindustan Transport Co. vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner 189 ITR 326 Abhishek …