Category: Judgments
No concealment penalty-non disclosure of disallowance 40(a)(ia) in computation of income as the issue is debatable due to High Court decisions ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1076 (2016) (12) ITAT Assessment Year: 2008-09 Date of Judgment: 01-12-2016 Brief Facts of the Case: During the scrutiny proceedings of the …
SC stays order to place security guards at all ATMs 24×7. The Gauhati High Court in suo motu PIL had issued directions for preventing ATM frauds. The Apex Court yesterday stayed the order of the Gauhati High Court directing all banks to deploy security guards at all ATMs 24×7 round …
Exemption us 10(19A) apply to whole palace including let out part and not confined only to portion in actual occupation of Ruler-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1075 (2016) (12) SC Assessment Year: 1978-79 Important Case Laws cited: Maharawal Laxman Singh vs. C.I.T. C.I.T. vs. H.H. Maharao …
SC Hearing on Demonetisation deferred to Friday, 9th December, 2016 Due to the non availability of the Chief Justice T. S. Thakur, the hearing has been adjourned to 9th of December, 2016 Earlier on 02-12-2016 Today, the Hon’ble Supreme Court started hearing a bunch of petitions (15 in …
Admitted pending petitions not become non-existent or nullity by filing fresh writ. The Idea of filing fresh petition to get earlier admitted writs petitions heard rejected by High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1074 (2016) (12) HC Important Case Laws cited: B. Srinivasa Reddy Vs. Karnataka Urban …
Penalty initiated for concealment levied for inaccurate particulars and concealment both is invalid. AO must frame a precise charge u/s 271(1)(c)-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1073 (2016) (12) ITAT Assessment Year: 2009-10 Date of Judgment: 29-11-2016 Important Case Laws cited: Zoom Communications P Ltd 327 ITR 510 …
Sales incomplete till goods delivery unless insurable risk passes to buyer. FOR destination basis sales invoice reversal for goods in transit at the year end valid-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1072 (2016) (12) ITAT Assessment Year: 2011-12 Date of Judgment: 29-11-2016 Important Case Laws cited: Morvi Industries …
Offer Period under SEBI Takeover Regulations commencement date is from the date of concluded share purchase agreement for violation u/s 22(7)-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1071 (2016) (12) SC The Grievance: In the present case, SEBI had challenged order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal reversing the …
50C provisions not apply to transfer of right in partnership firm. Sale deed was executed in favour of incoming partners for transferring retiring partner’s right in the property belonging to the partnership firm-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1070 (2016) (12) ITAT Assessment Year: 2011-12 Date/Month of Judgment/Order: …
Delhi HC-weddings cash withdrawal limits not unjustified and unwarranted as the rigid conditions apply only when payments exceeds Rs. 10000/- ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1069 (2016) (11) HC Important Case Laws cited: Parisons Agrotech (P) Ltd. v. Union of India (2015) 9 SCC 657, Manohar Lal Sharma …