Category: Judgments
Supreme Court explains principles of Spousal, parental and filial consortium for award of compensation under Motor Vehicles Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2523 (2018) 09 SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi (2017) 16 SCC 680 The Insurance Company had filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) to …
Interview call letter sent by email held valid even when postal delivery was made on the date of interview making attendance impossible ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2522 (2018) 09 HC The petitioner had applied for the post of Assistant Manager (Finance) in government corporation. The main case of the …
Commissioner DVAT directed to issue time barred F-Forms when it was not disputed that the transactions claimed were not genuine – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2521 (2018) 09 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Department …
Approved gratuity fund contributions paid in respect of employees taken over by the company eligible for deduction under Section 36(1)(v) – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2520 (2018) 09 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Commissioner of Income Tax v. Textool Co.Ltd. Commissioner …
Settlement Commission has power to reject Application at three stages. Bar u/s 245K(2) is not in respect of application for a future assessment year – HC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2519 (2018) 09 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: C.I.T. vs. Express Newspaper Ltd., …
Reevaluation of Patent Agent Examination answer sheet not permissible as policy adopted by CGPDTM prohibited reevaluation/reassessment -High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2518 (2018) 09 HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Ran Vijay Singh & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.: (2018) …
Claim of deprecation in revised return cannot be denied on the ground that it was not claimed in original return. Section 119(2)(b) had no applicability to the case- ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2517 (2018) 09 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Principal Commissioner …
Bogus Purchase 100% disallowance-Dismissal of SLP by Supreme Court did not merge the dismissal of the SLP into the order of the Apex Court – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2516 (2018) 09 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. …
When no substantial question of law was framed, High Court had no jurisdiction to examine the issue in its second appellate jurisdiction- Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2515 (2018) 09 SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Sanatosh Hazari vs. Purushottam Tiwari Surat Singh vs. Siri Bhagwan & Ors. The instant appeal was filed by the plaintiffs against the final judgment and order passed by the High Court in Second …
Reopening quashed as assessee was only a benamidar of alleged bank accounts and no action was taken against the real account holder ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2514 (2018) 09 ITAT The instant appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order passed by the CIT(A) whereby …
