Category: Judgments
Offer Period under SEBI Takeover Regulations commencement date is from the date of concluded share purchase agreement for violation u/s 22(7)-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1071 (2016) (12) SC The Grievance: In the present case, SEBI had challenged order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal reversing the …
50C provisions not apply to transfer of right in partnership firm. Sale deed was executed in favour of incoming partners for transferring retiring partner’s right in the property belonging to the partnership firm-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1070 (2016) (12) ITAT Assessment Year: 2011-12 Date/Month of Judgment/Order: …
Delhi HC-weddings cash withdrawal limits not unjustified and unwarranted as the rigid conditions apply only when payments exceeds Rs. 10000/- ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1069 (2016) (11) HC Important Case Laws cited: Parisons Agrotech (P) Ltd. v. Union of India (2015) 9 SCC 657, Manohar Lal Sharma …
Imprest account not necessarily part of partner capital account as held by ITAT was based merely on partner’s statement without properly analysing the evidence-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1068 (2016) (11) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The responding assessee was a partnership fir. The return …
National Anthem playing in cinema halls made mandatory. National Anthem be played before start of feature film and everyone must stand up-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1067 (2016) (11) SC A Division bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court has today made plying of National Anthem in …
Interest on loan for declaring dividend allowable deduction u/s 36(1)(iii) even in absence of profits/reserves and the treatment of such dividend as loans in the books of the company – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1066 (2016) (11) HC Assessment Year: 2008-09 Date/Month of Judgment/Order: 07-11-2016 Important …
No Penalty 271(1)(c) if primary information is furnished with ITR as held by Supreme Court in the case of Reliance Petroproducts Pvt Ltd-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1065 (2016) (11) ITAT Assessment Year: 2008-09 Date of Judgment: 28-11-2016 Important Case Laws cited: Reliance Petroproducts Pvt Ltd Brief …
Business income or STCG-Frequency-repetition of sale purchase not conclusive. Factors like main business / profession of assessee, intention while purchasing shares, holding the same as investment, earning of dividend income thereon etc. are required to be seen -ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1064 (2016) (11) ITAT Assessment …
Depreciation claim disallowed-defective machine not ready to use. Legal ownership not a must but the machine if not used, should at least be ready to use-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1063 (2016) (11) ITAT Assessment Year: 2009-10 Date of the Judgment: 16-11-2016 Brief Facts of the Case: The …
ITAT duty bound to grant relief even if no specific ground raised. Even without alternative submission, Tribunal must pass consequential orders suo motu. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1062 (2016) (11) HC Important Case Laws considered: CIBA of India Ltd vs. CIT (1993) 202 ITR 0001 (Bombay High Court) …
