Category: Judgments
Encashment of bank guarantee as performance security in BoT Project was revenue expenditure. If property constructed not owned by the assessee, expenditure incurred would not be capital – ITATÂ ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2571 (2018) (10) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT versus …
Alleged gift from foreign citizen on his death held colouring device as it was based upon undated nomination paper not supported with any evidence ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2570 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: The Assessing Officer (AO) noticed that the …
Limitation Act applicable to IBC 2016 from its inception for CRIP applications filed under Sections 7 and 9Â – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2569 (2018) (10) SC The present case laws deals with Section 238A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code), which was inserted …
Proportionate allocation of deemed dividend based on shareholding of borrowing company may arise if there are two or more common shareholders in lending and borrowing company ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2568 (2018) (10) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: ACIT Vs Bhaumik Colours Pvt. …
Sawai Man Singh was not holder of an impartible estate, He was absolute Ruler till merger and thereafter his status was of a HUF ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2567 (2018) (10) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Shiba Prasad Singh vs. Rani Prayag Kumari …
No Late Fee 234E can be levied when challan cum statement Form 26QB filed within the due date as required u/s 200(3)Â rwr 31A(4A) – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2566 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Mahavir AGENCY vs. Income Tax OFFICER …
Expecting assessee to submit voluminous details at fag end in a short period of time when AO kept assessment proceedings dormant for one year was unjustified – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2565 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Pr.CIT Vs. Ashokji …
TPO had no power to impose penalty u/s 271G before 01.10.2014. Law operating on the date on which the wrongful act is committed determines the penalty ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2564 (2018) (10) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Brij Mohan vs. Commissioner of …
No question of change of opinion when subject matter income not shown in original return or was not the subject of earlier reopening. High Court upheld double reopening ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2563 (2018) (10) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Commissioner of Income …
Rejection of books of account for failure to file confirmation from parties not justified. Rejection of a particular expenditure no reason for treating books of account them defective u/s 145(3) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2562 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT …
