Category: Supreme Court
Section 14A applies to dividend income u/s 115-O on which tax is paid by the dividend paying company-Supreme Court explains ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1235 (2017) (05) SC The issue: The issue in the present appeal was related to the admissibility or otherwise of deduction of expenditure …
Disallowance us 40(a)(ia) applies to amounts paid also-Supreme Court. Allahabad HC judgment holding that it applies to amount payable at the year end overruled ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1227 (2017) (04) SC Date/Month of Pronouncement: May, 2017 The Controversy-Section 40(a)(ia) applies to sums paid or payable? Section …
Subrata Roy ready to go to Jail if cheques dishonours Recently, Supreme Court had ordered auction of Sahara Aamby Valley and warned Subrata Roy to be present in the Court on 27th April, 2017 not to honour his affidavit or face wrath of Law. On the scheduled day, …
Filing false complaints against husband amounts to cruelty. Such Acts of Wife have effect of lowering his reputation in the eyes of his peer- Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1221 (2017) (04) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa 2013 (5) SCC …
Let justice be done though the heavens fall-Supreme Court explains the ambit of Article 142 of the Constitution viz-a-viz powers of the Apex Court ABCAUS Case law Citation: 1218 (2017)(04) SC Important Case Law Cited/referred A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak & Another, (1988) 2 SCC 602, Supreme Court …
Slump Sale of entire running business was LTCG us 48(2). Sale in one go with assets and liabilities cannot be considered as STCG for Taxation-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1216 (2017) (04) SC The Grievance: The appellant Commission of Income Tax (CIT) was aggrieved by the …
Supreme Court order for Sahara Aamby Valley auction. Subrata Roy warned to be present not to play truancy and honour affidavit or face wrath of Law S.E.B.I. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SAHARA INDIA REAL ESTATE CORPN.LTD.&ORS. (Respondent) CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON’BLE …
Reopening for cash deposits for non response to notice u/s 133(6) is illegal where assessment was completed u/s 143(3)/147 and 4 years have lapsed. Soon after the demonetization, the Income Tax Department (‘Department’) had launched a scheme called “operation Clean money” for online verification of cash deposits in …
BCI can not remand disciplinary proceedings transferred to it u/s 36B(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961 from the State Bar Council – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1202 (2017) (04) SC The Ground of Appeal: The appellant advocate contended that the time consumed in disposal …
Share premium not part of capital employed in the business of the company for claim of deduction u/s 35D as it is not specifically said so in Explanation -Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1189 (2017) (03) SC The Question of Law: Whether “premium” collected by the …