Category: Supreme Court
Juridical seat of Arbitration attracts law of the location. In such cases Part I of the Arbitration Act would not have any application-Supreme Court Case Law Details: Civil Appeals Nos. 5131-5133 of 2016 Eitzen Bulk A/S …. Appellants vs. Ashapura Minechem Ltd. & ANR. ..Respondents Civil Appeal No. 5136 of 2016 Ashapura …
No mandatory show cause notice requirement us 263-SC. Only reasonable opportunity of hearing to be afforded to the assessee The Supreme Court in its latest judgment delivered in the case of legendary Indian Movie actor Amitabh Bachchan (Big-B) has upheld and restored the CIT revisionary order u/s 263 …
The contents of Reports alleging sexual harassment can hardly relate to affairs of State or anything concerning national security-Supreme Court. The Government officials seems to have double standards when it comes to maintain transparency in their conduct in dealing with sexual harassment at work place. The recent judgment …
Encashment of Bank Guarantee of contractor against disputed claim of damages not permitted unless adjudicated by Court of law in judicial proceedings -Supreme Court Case Law Details: Civil Apeal No. 4814 of 2016 M/s Gangotri Enterprises Ltd. Appellant(s) VERSUS Union of India & Ors. Respondent(s) Date of Judgment: 05/05/2016 …
In a recent judgment, Supreme Court has upheld that special audit u/s 142(2A) was an integral step towards assessment proceedings and hence High Court was right in holding that period for which special audit was stayed shall be excluded in counting limitation for concluding block assessment u/s 158BE. Case Law …
The Supreme Court in its recent judgment has held that tips collected by the hotel from customers and distributed to employees are not salary for the purpose of TDS under Section 192. Case Law Details: Civil Appeal Nos. 4435-37 of 2016 ITC Limited Gurgaon (Appellant) versus Commissioner of IT (TDS) Delhi (Respondent) …
Supreme Court in a latest judgment has held that Fees collection by Universities does not amount to Government funding for exemption u/s 10(23c)(iiiab) merely because such fees are authorized under the relevant Act or fees rates are fixed by Govt. authorised Agencies Case Law Details: Civil Appeal No. 4361-4366 of …
In a recent judgment Supreme Court has held that prior to 2005 amendment, after joint family property has been distributed in accordance with section 8 on principles of intestacy, the joint family property ceases to be joint family property in the hands of the various persons who have …
The Supreme Court recalls its judgment delivered on 28-07-2013 delivered by a three judge Bench which had quashed the National Eligibility Entrance Test as unconstitutional. The judgment was alleged as leaked even before it was pronounced and had created a lot of controversies. A 5-judge Bench headed by Justice Anil …
In its latest judgment, the Supreme Court has held that the transaction charges paid to the Bombay Stock Exchange by its members are not for ‘technical services’ and hence no TDS on such payments is deductible under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act 1961. Case Details: Civil Appeal No. 3141 …
