No Penalty 271(1)(c) even if quantum proceedings upheld additions. Merely because a bona fide explanation did not find favour, penalty not justified

No Penalty 271(1)(c) even if quantum proceedings upheld additions. Merely because a bona fide explanation did not find favour, it would not justify the levy of concealment penalty-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1034 (2016) (10) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: A search operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, …

IDS 2016 Clarification-electronic communication of Form-2 and eligibility where search, seizure conducted on or after 01-06-2016. CBDT Instruction 11/2016

IDS 2016 Clarification Instruction No. 11 of 2016 F.No.142/8/2016-TPL(Part) Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue (Central Board of Direct Taxes) *** New Delhi, the 13th October, 2016 To, All Principal Chief Commissioners of Income-tax Sub.: The Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 – reg. Representations have been …

Income Tax Department vindictively disallowed agricultural income claim of Jayalalithaa. Sasikala also gets similar relief from ITAT

Income Tax Department vindictively disallowed agricultural income claim of Jayalalithaa.  Sasikala also gets relief from ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1033 (2016) (10) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case(s): In both the cases, among other thing, the claim of agricultural income was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO) …

No income concealment us 271(1(c) on gift under explanation 5A. NSC declared us 153A was received as inheriting, gift from father, grandfather-ITAT

No income concealment us 271(1(c) on gift under explanation 5A. NSC declared us 153A was received as inheriting, gift from father, grandfather-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1032 (2016) (10) ITAT  Important case law cited: Sheraton Apparels Vs. ACIT (2002) 256 ITR 20 Brief Facts of the Case: The …