Tag: Madras High Court

Delay in filing Form 56F was only a procedural lapse and that cannot be a ground for not granting the deduction claimed under Section 10AA of the Act.  In a recent judgment, the Madras High Court has upheld that delay in filing Form 56F was only a procedural …

In a recent judgment, the Madras High Court has directed CBDT to accept the e-return filed by the appellant company after midnight due to heavy rush and snag at the income tax e-filing website, as within due date and give benefit of carry forward of loss under Section …

In a recent judgment, the Madras High Court has upheld the Constitutional validity of section 94A(1) of the Income tax Act, 1961 and CBDT Notification 86/2013 specifying ‘Cyprus’ as the ‘notified jurisdictional area for the purpose of the said section. Case Details: W.P.Nos.17241 to 17243 & 17407 to 17412 of …