Tag: penalty u/s 271D
Advance taken in cash against sale not loan or deposit u/s 269SS hence no penalty us/ 271D is leviable on the assessee ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3447 (2021) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in sustaining the order …
No tax audit in one proprietorship firm-ITAT deleted penalty u/s 271B as when no accounts was maintained, assessee was not be expected to get them audited. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3166 (2019) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Shri Rajeshbhai Hirabhai Patel Vs. ITOShri Udayshankar …
Cash loan from wife due to business expediency. Penalty u/s 271D deleted as the business was carried on in the interest of family and genuineness/sources was not doubted ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3161 (2019) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Penmetsa Venkata Soma RajuDr. Dutta …
Penalty u/s 271D for taking cash loan from father and paternal aunt deleted following various decisions of High Courts and Tribunals ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 3001 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Mohan Karkare Vs. DCIT (1995)(127 Taxation 104) CIT v. Sunil …
Penalty u/s 271D deleted as cash loan was repaid by cheque. Reasons accepted in quantum proceedings should have been accepted in penalty proceeding ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2992 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: M.S. Lakaiah Dimple Yadav 379 ITR 177 (All.) …
Penalty u/s 271D-Cash received to get a good bank balance certificate for visa of the daughter constituted a reasonable cause within the meaning of section 273B ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2933 (2019) (05) ITAT The only issue in the instant appeal filed by the assessee was as …
Penalty u/s 271D deleted for cash loan from father mother and brothers as loan was from close family relations and there was a reasonable cause u/s 273B ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2927 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT vs. M. …
Penalty u/s 271D unjustified when bank refused loan and cash was obtained for meeting urgent business expenses as it was a reasonable cause u/s 273B ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2750 (2019) (01) ITAT The instant appeal by the assessee was against the order passed by the Commissioner …
Penalty u/s 271D was absurd when assessee himself was karta of HUF from where he obtained cash loan-ITAT deleted penalty for violation of section 269SS ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2749 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Rajendra Suryavanshi Vs ACIT (2011) 141 …
No penalty u/s 271D can be levied when cash loans were treated as undisclosed income of the assessee u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2743 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Diwan Enterprises vs. CIT CIT vs. Standard …
