Tag: penalty u/s 271D
No Penalty u/s 271D for cash received before registrar for sale of property – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Chennai has deleted income tax penalty us/ 271D holding that section 269SS would apply only to advance receivable and the provisions would not apply to transaction that has …
Proceedings u/s 269SS for levy of penalty u/s 271D are independent proceedings- ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Cuttack has held that proceedings u/s 269SS for levy of penalty u/s 271D are independent proceedings and are not related to assessment proceedings ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 4038 (2024) …
Penalty u/s 271D stayed as assessee denied having received cash loan and matter was pending in Civil Court In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble High Court has stayed penalty order u/s 271D stayed as assessee denied having received cash loan and matter was pending in Civil Court. ABCAUS …
No penalty can be levied if AO failed to record such satisfaction in assessment order. Penalty proceedings would necessarily be initiated in the quantum assessment order itself. In a recent judgment, ITAT has deleted income tax penalty u/s 271D and 271E holding that no penalty can be levied …
Section 269SS not apply to cash receipt of sale consideration of immovable property, it deals only with loan or deposit – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that section 269SS of the Act does not deals with the receipt of ‘sale consideration of immovable property’ in …
Penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS can not be escaped by establishing genuineness or bona fides of the transactions – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3752 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Hareshkumar Bechardas Patel Vs. Jt. CIT (2019) 69 ITR 73 (SN) (Ahd.) (Trib.)ITO …
Penalty u/s 271D initiated when assessee was alive but order invalid if passed in the name of assessee after his death ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3733 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:ITO v. Bhupendra Bhikhalal Desai 131 taxmann.com 40 (SC)ITO vs. Durlabhbhai Kanubhai Rajpara 114 taxmann.com …
If one proceeding is saved, other has to be quashed – interesting judgment of ITAT on reassessment and penalty proceedings. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3649 (2023) (01) ITAT This interesting judgment of the ITAT deals with one quantum-appeal filed by assessee against the order passed by Commissioner of …
Liability of company paid by Director in cash is cash loan u/s 269SS liable to Penalty u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 3640 (2023) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:CIT v. Dimple Yadav, reported in (2015) 280 CTR (All) 309CIT …
Date of initiation of penalty proceedings in assessment order is the relevant date u/s 275(1)(c) for limitation purpose. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3618 (2022) (11) HC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Mahesh Wood Products Pvt. Ltd.Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. JKD …
