Tag: unexplained cash credits
Explanation can not be rejected applying prudent mans behaviour test. High Court deletes addition made for cash deposits applying Principle of preponderance of probability ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2261 (2018) (03) HC The appellant assessee had challenged the order of the ITAT in confirming the addition under …
Addition for cash deposit in joint bank account with grandfather upheld. High Court rejected the plea that the assessee was only helping his old grand-father for operating the bank account. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2252 (2018) (03) HC The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order of …
Standard Procedure for applying provisions of unexplained cash credits u/s 68 of Income tax Act,1961 Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued a detailed instruction specifying SOP for dealing with unexplained cash credits u/s 68. As per the said Instruction, the following sequence of steps have been prescribed …
Execution of registered sale deed adjusting cash credit entries in books establishes identity of depositors of money beyond doubt-High Court upheld deletion of additions made u/s 68 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2140 (2017) (12) HC The Challenge/Grievance: This instant appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section …
Unexplained Cash Credits in Bank Statements held taxable u/s 68. Non production of document is different from not maintaining Books of Account – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2045 (2017) (08) HC The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order of the Income …
Section 68 not attracted to amount representing credit purchases. Findings of ITAT upheld by High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2012 (2017) (08) HC The respondent assessee was a Government Contractor in the business of road construction. His return of income was selected for scrutiny and …
Addition us 68 for accommodation entries-don’t shoot the messenger. Addition restricted to commission earned on accommodation entries-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 1125 (2017) (02) ITAT Assessment Year : 1995-96Date/Month of Pronouncement: February, 2017 Brief Facts of the Case:The present judgment was delivered in the second round of litigation. …
In a latest judgment, ITAT Chennai has upheld that allowing set off of business loss from the unexplained cash credits u/s 68 not permissible in view of harmonious and combined reading of sections 71 , 72 and 32(2). Case Law Details: I.T.A.No.325/Mds./2015 vs. Assessment Year :2006-07 Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax …
Addition for Unexplained Investment u/s 69 quashed as Muslims religion bars Interest income therefore cash was kept at home INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW ITA No.697/LKW/2015 Assessment year:2010-11 Mehrun Nisha (Appellant) vs. Income Tax Officer (Respondent) Date of Order: 04-03-2016 ORDER PER A. K. GARODIA, A.M. This is …
