Category: GST

If address of consignor or consignee is correct, merely for wrong PIN code, the proceedings u/s 129 can not be initiated – High Court In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court quashed order under section 129(3) of GST Act holding that when goods in question was accompanied …

Cancellation or Suspension of GST registration would be counterproductive and work against the interest of the revenue – HC In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Calcutta High Court observed that suspension/revocation of the GST registration would be counterproductive and work against the interest of the revenue as the assessee …

When goods are loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill specifically mentioning both truck numbers, no intention to evade payment of tax can be attributed. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court held that when goods could not be accommodated in one truck and therefore, loaded …

Mere nondisclosure of place of destination in the documents cannot be a ground for seizure u/s 129 of GST Act. In a recent judgment, Allahabad High Court has held that merely non-disclosure of place of destination in the accompanying documents cannot be a ground for seizure of goods …

Penalty confirmed as loading point of the goods loaded in vehicle was different as declared in E- Way Bill which is confirmed by driver and GPS location In a recent judgment, Hon’ble High Court of Jharkhand confirmed penalty as loading point of the goods loaded in vehicle was …

When e-way bill generated prior to detention order, there could not be an intention to evade payment of tax. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has quashed penalty order under section 129(3) of the GST Act as the e-way bill was generated much prior to the …

Supreme Court stays DGGI order on the issue of bar on two parallel GST proceedings in terms of Section 6(2)(b) of GST Act In a recent order, Hon’ble Supreme Court admitted SLP against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which held that law laid down by Supreme …

Ongoing investigation qua absconding person, cannot be a ground to deny bail to person against whom the investigations have been completed and the Complaint filed in the Court. In a recent judgment, Delhi High Court has granted bail to the accused of GST evasion holding that ongoing investigation …

No penalty u/s 129(3) of GST Act for non-filling of Part -B of the e-way bill due to technical glitch when there was no intention to evade payment of tax In a recent judgment, Allahabad High Court has held that penalty under section 129(3) of the GST Act …

When tax was paid by supplier in the form GSTR-01 & GSTR-3B, no adverse inference can be drawn against the purchaser on the premise that the registration of the seller dealer was cancelled subsequently. In a recent judgment, Allahabad High Court has quashed order passed under section 74 …